Skip to main content
All lobbying filings

DOMTAR CORPORATION

Lobbying for DOMTAR CORPORATION · Manufacturing

 Filing 2nd Quarter - Report
Reporting period
2nd Quarter 2025
Apr 1 - June 30 · Posted Jul 18, 2025
Expenses
$240,000.00
What this organization spent lobbying with its own staff. Reported using A: the three LDA methods count different costs, so an expenses figure is not comparable across filers that used different ones.
Client based in
South Carolina

Official filing document

 Government bodies contacted 5
  • Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
  • SENATE
  • White House Office

The chambers, agencies and offices the filer named. It does not say who inside them was contacted, or when.

 Lobbying activity 8
Tariff (miscellaneous tariff bills)

Discussed the impact of tariffs, including the softwood lumber trade dispute, and the need for fair trade practices to protect domestic industries; discussed the evasion of duties on thermal paper tariffs and enforcement of trade regulations; discussed section 232 investigation.

Trade (domestic/foreign)

Discussed the impact of tariffs, including the softwood lumber trade dispute, and the need for fair trade practices to protect domestic industries; discussed the evasion of duties on thermal paper tariffs and enforcement of trade regulations; discussed the implications of the European Union Deforestation Regulation on trade; discussed section 232 investigation;

Manufacturing

Discussed the impact of energy policy and the need for regulatory reform on manufacturing operations; discussed the hydroelectric dam associated with Domtar's Rothschild, Wisconsin mill and explored opportunities for federal funding support; discussed the importance of including/confirming the carbon neutrality of biomass in the Farm Bill; addressed concerns over taxation, tariffs, and their impact on manufacturing activities; discussed the broader implications of trade policies on manufacturing, including implications for Section 232 investigations and potential future investments in Alabama; discussed concerns regarding the competitive disadvantage faced by U.S. manufacturers due to legislative efforts impacting consumer protections.

Agriculture

Discussed the importance of including/confirming the carbon neutrality of biomass in the Farm Bill; discussed regulatory form and the impact of energy policies and pipeline infrastructure on agricultural operations; discussed the implications of the EUDR on agricultural exports; discussed the effects of taxation and tariffs on the agricultural sector, including the impact on trade, section 232 investigations, and the competitiveness of agricultural products;

Environment/Superfund

Discussed the EPA regulatory reform and impact on energy policy and pipeline infrastructure; discussed importance of including/confirming the carbon neutrality of biomass in the Farm Bill; discussed the European Union Deforestation Regulation and its implications for environmental standards and compliance in agricultural and manufacturing sectors; discussed the broader effects of taxation and tariffs on environmental policies.

Taxation/Internal Revenue Code

Discussed the impact of tax policies on potential future investments in Alabama; discussed the interplay between tax policies and EPA regulatory reform, emphasizing the need for tax incentives to support compliance with environmental regulations; discussed the implications of tariffs and their evasion and the need for tax policies that address these issues to protect domestic industries; discussed the broader effects of taxation on infrastructure projects;

Natural Resources

Discussed energy policy and pipeline infrastructure; discussed the importance of including/confirming the carbon neutrality of biomass in the Farm Bill; discussed infrastructure projects, such as the hydroelectric dam in Rothschild, Wisconsin, and the exploration of federal funding support.

Energy/Nuclear

Discussed energy policy and the need for comprehensive reforms; discussed the impact of pipeline infrastructure and EPA regulatory reform; discussed the exploration of federal funding support for infrastructure projects, such as the hydroelectric dam in Rothschild, Wisconsin;

Source: federal Lobbying Disclosure Act filing, reproduced as filed. Bills are parsed from the activity descriptions.

Report a problem