Skip to main content
S. 4534 116th Congress Senate

Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act

Official title: A bill to amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the scope of protection from civil liability for "good Samaritan" blocking and screening of offensive material.

Introduced: September 8, 2020 Introduced by: Roger F. Wicker Republican · Mississippi See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter

Free account. One morning email at most, only on days something moved. Already have one? Sign in.

This bill died when the 116th Congress ended
It never became law before the 116th Congress (2019–2020) adjourned, and bills don't carry over to the next Congress. It would have to be reintroduced. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 2 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Sep 8, 2020
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Sep 8, 2020
Introduced in Senate
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Latest action September 8, 2020

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act

This bill limits the immunity of a provider or user of an interactive computer service (i.e., social media platform) for screening and blocking offensive material on the service's platform, revises the applicability of civil liability for this moderation of offensive material, and changes a definition that governs applicability of the immunity.

Under current law, this immunity protects a provider or user of a social media platform from being treated as the publisher or speaker of information provided by another information content provider.

The bill removes this immunity from a decision, agreement, or action by a provider or user of a social media platform to restrict access to or availability of material provided by another information content provider. To avoid liability for this conduct, in addition to acting in good faith, the bill requires that the actor must have an objectively reasonable belief that the material is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, promoting self-harm, promoting terrorism, or unlawful. Currently, a good faith actor must only consider such material to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable.

Further, the bill redefines information content provider to encompass any person who editorializes or affirmatively and substantively modifies the content of another person or entity.

 Related & companion bills 1
 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). S. 4534: Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act. 116th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/116-S-4534/
MLA
"S. 4534: Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act." 116th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/116-S-4534/.
Bluebook (legal)
S. 4534, 116th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/116-S-4534/.
Markdown link
[S. 4534: Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act](https://openamerica.io/bill/116-S-4534/)
Report a problem