Skip to main content
H. Res. 1289 111th Congress House

Expressing the sense of the House that Democratic Members of the House should join Republican Members of the House in a total ban on earmarks for one year, that total discretionary spending should be…

Official title: Expressing the sense of the House that Democratic Members of the House should join Republican Members of the House in a total ban on earmarks for one year, tha… Show full official titleShow less

Official title: Expressing the sense of the House that Democratic Members of the House should join Republican Members of the House in a total ban on earmarks for one year, that total discretionary spending should be reduced by the amount saved by earmark moratoriums, and that a bipartisan, bicameral committee should be created to review and overhaul the budgetary, spending, and earmark processes.

Introduced: April 22, 2010 See on congress.gov
Congress AppropriationsBudget deficits and national debtBudget processCongressional committees
More subjectsShow fewer subjects
Government studies and investigationsHouse of RepresentativesPolitical parties and affiliation
This resolution expired with the 111th Congress
It was not agreed to before the 111th Congress (2009–2010) adjourned, so it is no longer active. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 5 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Agreed to (House)
Apr 22, 2010
Referred to House Rules
Apr 22, 2010
Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Apr 22, 2010
Referred to House Budget
Apr 22, 2010
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E625)
Apr 22, 2010
Introduced in House
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Latest action April 22, 2010

Referred to House Rules

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that: (1) Democratic Members of the House should join its Republican Members in a total ban on earmarks for one year; (2) discretionary spending should be reduced in the concurrent budget resolution for FY2011 by the total amount that was spent on requests for earmarks in FY2010; (3) if spending in that resolution is not reduced by such amount, an amendment to that resolution to effectuate this change should be made in order; and (4) a complete review and overhaul of the congressional budgetary, spending, and earmark processes should be commenced by creating a bipartisan, bicameral committee to study the issue and report to the House and Senate with its recommendations.

 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2
 Cosponsors 36
R
Aderholt, Robert B.
Alabama · Apr 22, 2010
R
Bilirakis, Gus M.
Florida · Apr 22, 2010
R
Blackburn, Marsha
Tennessee · Apr 22, 2010
R
Boozman, John
Arkansas · Apr 22, 2010
R
Buchanan, Vern
Florida · Apr 22, 2010
R
Calvert, Ken
California · Apr 22, 2010
R
Capito, Shelley Moore
West Virginia · Apr 22, 2010
R
Carter, John R.
Texas · Apr 22, 2010
R
Cassidy, Bill
Louisiana · Apr 22, 2010
R
Diaz-Balart, Mario
Florida · Apr 22, 2010
Fallin, Mary
· Apr 22, 2010
R
Foxx, Virginia
North Carolina · Apr 22, 2010
R
Graves, Sam
Missouri · Apr 22, 2010
Griffith, Parker
· Apr 22, 2010
R
Guthrie, Brett
Kentucky · Apr 22, 2010
R
Issa, Darrell
California · Apr 22, 2010
R
Jordan, Jim
Ohio · Apr 22, 2010
R
Latta, Robert E.
Ohio · Apr 22, 2010
Lee, Christopher
· Apr 22, 2010
R
Lucas, Frank D.
Oklahoma · Apr 22, 2010
R
Lummis, Cynthia M.
Wyoming · Apr 22, 2010
McCarthy, Kevin
· Apr 22, 2010
R
McCaul, Michael T.
Texas · Apr 22, 2010
R
McClintock, Tom
California · Apr 22, 2010
R
Moran, Jerry
Kansas · Apr 22, 2010
R
Rogers, Harold
Kentucky · Apr 22, 2010
R
Rogers, Mike D.
Alabama · Apr 22, 2010
R
Scalise, Steve
Louisiana · Apr 22, 2010
R
Sessions, Pete
Texas · Apr 22, 2010
R
Simpson, Michael K.
Idaho · Apr 22, 2010
R
Smith, Adrian
Nebraska · Apr 22, 2010
R
Smith, Christopher H.
New Jersey · Apr 22, 2010
R
Thompson, Glenn
Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 2010
R
Turner, Michael R.
Ohio · Apr 22, 2010
R
Wilson, Joe
South Carolina · Apr 22, 2010
R
Wittman, Robert J.
Virginia · Apr 22, 2010
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Res. 1289: Expressing the sense of the House that Democratic Members of the House should join Republican Members of the House in a total ban on earmarks for one year, that total discretionary spending should be reduced by the amount saved by earmark moratoriums, and that a bipartisan, bicameral committee should be created to review and overhaul the budgetary, spending, and earmark processes.. 111th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/111-HRES-1289/
MLA
"H. Res. 1289: Expressing the sense of the House that Democratic Members of the House should join Republican Members of the House in a total ban on earmarks for one year, that total discretionary spending should be reduced by the amount saved by earmark moratoriums, and that a bipartisan, bicameral committee should be created to review and overhaul the budgetary, spending, and earmark processes.." 111th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/111-HRES-1289/.
Bluebook (legal)
H. Res. 1289, 111th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/111-HRES-1289/.
Markdown link
[H. Res. 1289: Expressing the sense of the House that Democratic Members of the House should join Republican Members of the House in a total ban on earmarks for one year, that total discretionary spending should be reduced by the amount saved by earmark moratoriums, and that a bipartisan, bicameral committee should be created to review and overhaul the budgetary, spending, and earmark processes.](https://openamerica.io/bill/111-HRES-1289/)
Report a problem