Skip to main content
HRES 411 99th Congress House

A resolution to express the sense of the House of Representatives that the deferral process established by the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is unconstitutional under the United States Supreme…

Official title: A resolution to express the sense of the House of Representatives that the deferral process established by the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is unconstitutio… Show full official titleShow less

Official title: A resolution to express the sense of the House of Representatives that the deferral process established by the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is unconstitutional under the United States Supreme Court decision in "Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha et al".

Introduced: May 20, 1986 See on congress.gov
Economics and Public Finance Congress and Members of CongressCongressional oversightCongressional vetoConstitutional law
More subjectsShow fewer subjects
Executive impoundment of appropriated fundsFederal budgets
This resolution expired with the 99th Congress
It was not agreed to before the 99th Congress (1985–1986) adjourned, so it is no longer active. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Agreed to (House)
Apr 17, 1986
Referred to Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations.
Apr 9, 1986
Referred to House Committee on The Judiciary.
Apr 9, 1986
Introduced in House
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Latest action April 17, 1986

Referred to Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the deferral process established by the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is unconstitutional.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Res. 411: A resolution to express the sense of the House of Representatives that the deferral process established by the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is unconstitutional under the United States Supreme Court decision in "Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha et al".. 99th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/99-HRES-411/
MLA
"H. Res. 411: A resolution to express the sense of the House of Representatives that the deferral process established by the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is unconstitutional under the United States Supreme Court decision in "Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha et al".." 99th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/99-HRES-411/.
Bluebook (legal)
H. Res. 411, 99th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/99-HRES-411/.
Markdown link
[H. Res. 411: A resolution to express the sense of the House of Representatives that the deferral process established by the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is unconstitutional under the United States Supreme Court decision in "Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha et al".](https://openamerica.io/bill/99-HRES-411/)
Report a problem