Skip to main content
S 1495 119th Congress Senate Agriculture and Food

NRCS Wetland Compliance and Appeals Reform Act

Introduced: April 10, 2025 Introduced by: Rounds, Mike Republican · South Dakota See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 2 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Apr 10, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Apr 10, 2025
Introduced in Senate
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

NRCS Wetland Compliance and Appeals Reform Act

This bill revises provisions related to compliance and the appeals process for the wetland certification program at the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).

Among other things, this bill

  • prohibits the NRCS from acquiring any permanent easement;
  • prohibits the Department of Agriculture (USDA) from imposing penalties retroactively for newly determined wetlands;
  • revises the appeals process of the NRCS for wetland certification requests;
  • prohibits USDA from using new rationale for a wetland determination if a person has previously successfully appealed a final wetland determination;
  • establishes that USDA bears the burden of proof, by clear and convincing evidence, that a person has violated certain wetland conservation provisions;
  • requires USDA to establish oversight committees in each state that will oversee the appeals of wetland determinations; and
  • requires that each individual who interacts with the NRCS have the option to participate in a customer satisfaction survey provided by an independent survey company.

In addition, USDA must modify the appeals process to provide the person appealing with certain USDA records or documentation relating to the compliance violations.

Further, in an appeal that is related to a delineation, determination, or certification of a wetland, USDA must modify the process to (1) allow a person to call NRCS technical staff as a witness, (2) accept evidence provided by the person bringing the appeal as reliable absent substantial evidence that it is not reliable, and (3) compensate a person who successfully appeals for fees and expenses.

What's happening now April 10, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1