Skip to main content
H.R. 3827 117th Congress House

Protect Speech Act

Official title: To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 to ensure that the immunity under such section incentivizes online platforms to responsibly address ille… Show full official titleShow less

Official title: To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 to ensure that the immunity under such section incentivizes online platforms to responsibly address illegal content while not immunizing the disparate treatment of ideological viewpoints and continuing to encourage a vibrant, open, and competitive internet, and for other purposes.

Introduced: June 29, 2021 Introduced by: Jim Jordan Republican · Ohio See on congress.gov
This bill died when the 117th Congress ended
It never became law before the 117th Congress (2021–2022) adjourned, and bills don't carry over to the next Congress. It would have to be reintroduced. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Jun 14, 2021
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Jun 11, 2021
Introduced in House
Jun 11, 2021
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Latest action June 14, 2021

Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Protect Speech Act

This bill modifies the immunity from liability of a provider or user of an interactive computer service (e.g., a social media company) for screening and blocking offensive content on its platform.

Specifically, the bill provides that this immunity shall not apply to any action taken to restrict access to or availability of material provided by another information content provider unless the action is taken in good faith based on an objectively reasonable belief that the material is (1) obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, promoting terrorism or violent extremism, harassing, promoting self-harm, or unlawful; or (2) violates the applicable terms of service or use.

In order to avoid liability for taking action based on either belief, certain good faith requirements must be met, such as (1) making publicly available terms of service or use that plainly state the criteria for content moderation practices, and (2) not restricting access to or availability of material on deceptive grounds.

Further, the bill specifies that being responsible in whole or in part for the creation or development of information includes instances in which a person or entity solicits, comments upon, funds, or affirmatively and substantively contributes to, modifies, or alters information provided by another person or entity.

 Related & companion bills 1
 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H.R. 3827: Protect Speech Act. 117th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/117-HR-3827/
MLA
"H.R. 3827: Protect Speech Act." 117th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/117-HR-3827/.
Bluebook (legal)
H.R. 3827, 117th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/117-HR-3827/.
Markdown link
[H.R. 3827: Protect Speech Act](https://openamerica.io/bill/117-HR-3827/)
Report a problem