Skip to main content
HRES 230 107th Congress House Government Operations and Politics Agricultural prices Agriculture and Food Commerce Connecticut Dairy industry Interstate compacts Maine Massachusetts Milk New Hampshire Rhode Island Vermont

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's…

Show full title

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history.

Introduced: August 2, 2001 Introduced by: Sessions, Pete Republican · Texas See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
This resolution expired with the 107th Congress
It was not agreed to before the 107th Congress (2001–2002) adjourned, so it is no longer active. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Agreed to (House)
Sep 10, 2001
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.
Aug 2, 2001
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Aug 2, 2001
Introduced in House
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service
Declares that the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact should be allowed to expire under its own terms on September 30, 2001.
What's happening now September 10, 2001

Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.

 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2
 Cosponsors 5
All 5 Democratic 2 Republican 3
D
Baldwin, Tammy
Wisconsin · Aug 2, 2001
 D
Davis, Danny K.
Illinois · Aug 2, 2001
 R
Issa, Darrell
California · Aug 2, 2001
 R
Simpson, Michael K.
Idaho · Aug 2, 2001
 R
Thune, John
South Dakota · Aug 2, 2001
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Res. 230: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history.. 107th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/107-HRES-230/
MLA
"H. Res. 230: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history.." 107th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/107-HRES-230/.
Bluebook (legal)
H. Res. 230, 107th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/107-HRES-230/.
Markdown link
[H. Res. 230: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history.](https://openamerica.io/bill/107-HRES-230/)
Report a problem