Skip to main content
HR 2474 116th Congress House Labor and Employment Administrative law and regulatory procedures Administrative remedies Civil actions and liability Employment discrimination and employee rights Labor-management relations National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)

Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019

Introduced: May 2, 2019 Introduced by: Scott, Robert C. "Bobby" Democratic · Virginia See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 47 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Feb 10, 2020
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Feb 6, 2020
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 195 - 223 (Roll no. 49).
Feb 6, 2020
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Feb 6, 2020
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 224 - 194 (Roll no. 50).
Feb 6, 2020
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 224 - 194 (Roll no. 50).
Feb 6, 2020
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hern, Kevin (OK) motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to forbid a labor organization from communicating with an employee regarding joining or supporting the labor organization if the employee is not authorized to work in the United States.
Feb 6, 2020
Mr. Hern, Kevin moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on Education and Labor. (text: CR H925)
Feb 6, 2020
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Feb 6, 2020
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Feb 6, 2020
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2474.
Feb 6, 2020
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Rouda amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Rouda demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Rouda amendment No. 16.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Lawrence amendment No. 15.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Tlaib amendment No. 14
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Vargas amendment No. 13.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Rooney (FL) amendment No. 12.
Feb 6, 2020
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 11.
Feb 6, 2020
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Meadows amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Meadows demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Meadows amendment No. 10.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Stevens amendment No. 9.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Keller amendment No. 8.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Hayes amendment No. 7.
Feb 6, 2020
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Allen amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Allen demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Allen amendment No. 6.
Feb 6, 2020
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Wild amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Wild demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Wild amendment No. 5.
Feb 6, 2020
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Roe (TN) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Roe (TN) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Roe (TN) amendment No. 4.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Norcross amendment No. 3.
Feb 6, 2020
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Foxx amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Foxx demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Foxx amendment No. 2.
Feb 6, 2020
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Stevens amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Stevens demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Feb 6, 2020
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 833, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes on the Stevens amendment No. 1.
Feb 6, 2020
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 2474.
Feb 6, 2020
The Speaker designated the Honorable Earl Blumenauer to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Feb 6, 2020
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 833 and Rule XVIII.
Feb 6, 2020
Rule provides for consideration of H. Res. 826, H.R. 2474 and H.R. 5687. The resolution provides for consideration of H.Res. 826 under a closed rule with one hour of debate. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2474, under a structured rule and consideration of H.R. 5687, under a structured rule. Each bill shall be debated for one hour.
Feb 6, 2020
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 833. (consideration: CR H879-928; text: CR H895-898)
Feb 5, 2020
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 833 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H. Res. 826, H.R. 2474 and H.R. 5687. The resolution provides for consideration of H.Res. 826 under a closed rule with one hour of debate. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2474, under a structured rule and consideration of H.R. 5687, under a structured rule. Each bill shall be debated for one hour.
Dec 16, 2019
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 276.
Dec 16, 2019
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Labor. H. Rept. 116-347.
Sep 25, 2019
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 21.
Sep 25, 2019
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
May 2, 2019
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
May 2, 2019
Introduced in House
 Votes taken on this bill 2
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
Feb 7, 2020 House · vote #50 On Passage Passed 224194 See who voted →
Feb 7, 2020 House · vote #49 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions Failed 195223 See who voted →
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019

This bill expands various labor protections related to employees' rights to organize and collectively bargain in the workplace. Specifically, it

  • revises the definition of employee, supervisor, and employer to broaden the scope of individuals covered by the fair labor standards;
  • permits a labor organization to encourage participation of union members in strikes initiated by employees represented by a different labor organization (i.e., secondary strikes);
  • terminates the right of employers to bring claims against unions that conduct such secondary strikes;
  • permits the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to conduct economic analysis;
  • allows collective-bargaining agreements to require all employees represented by the bargaining unit to contribute fees to the labor organization for the cost of such representation, notwithstanding a state law to the contrary;
  • expands unfair labor practices to include prohibitions against replacement of, or discrimination against, workers who participate in strikes;
  • makes it an unfair labor practice to require or coerce employees to attend employer meetings designed to discourage union membership;
  • prohibits employers from entering into agreements with employees under which employees waive the right to pursue or a join collective or class-action litigation; and
  • requires the NLRB to promulgate rules requiring employers to post notices of employees' labor rights and protections and establishes penalties for failing to comply with such requirement.

The bill also addresses the procedures for union representation elections. Among other changes, the bill

  • prohibits employers from participating in any NLRB representation proceedings,
  • requires employers to provide a list of voters to the labor organization seeking to represent the bargaining unit in an NLRB-directed election,
  • compels employers to bargain with a labor organization that has received a majority of valid votes for representation in an NLRB-directed election, and
  • provides statutory authority for the requirement that the NLRB must set preelection hearings to begin not later than 8 days after notifying the labor organization of such a petition and set postelection hearings to begin not later than 14 days after an objection to a decision has been filed.

The bill modifies the protections against unfair labor practices that result in serious economic harm such as the discharge of an employee. Specifically, the bill

  • removes current limits on a court's ability to provide temporary injunctive relief upon a petition by the NLRB;
  • expands the available remedies for employees subject to such harms to include two times the amount of actual damages (e.g., back pay), consequential damages; and punitive damages; and
  • establishes a civil penalty in addition to any damage awards.

The bill further prohibits employers from taking adverse actions against an employee, including employees with management responsibilities, in response to that employee participating in protected activities related to the enforcement of the prohibitions against unfair labor practices (i.e., whistleblower protections). Such protected activities include

  • providing information about a potential violation to an enforcement agency,
  • participating in an enforcement proceeding,
  • initiating a proceeding concerning an alleged violation or assisting in such a proceeding, or
  • refusing to participate in an activity the employee reasonably believes is a violation of labor laws.

The bill also specifies procedures for adjudicating complaints, including, filing requirements, criteria for making determinations of violations, types of available relief, evidentiary guidelines, and judicial review of NLRB determinations.

The bill generally establishes penalties and permits injunctive relief against entities that fail to comply with NLRB orders and creates a private right of action for employees to bring claims against employers interfering with employees' rights to organize or join a labor organization.

Additionally, the bill modifies the reporting requirements for employers engaged in arrangements with third-parties to persuade employees not to organize. Specifically, the bill narrows the scope of the exemption for arrangements that are considered legal advice or representation.

The Government Accountability Office must analyze and report on comparative collective-bargaining practices in countries outside the United States.

What's happening now February 10, 2020

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2
 Cosponsors 128
D
Sewell, Terri A.
Alabama · Dec 5, 2019
R
Fitzpatrick, Brian K.
Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2019
R
Smith, Christopher H.
New Jersey · Oct 18, 2019
D
Davids, Sharice
Kansas · Oct 4, 2019
D
Blunt Rochester, Lisa
Delaware · Sep 26, 2019
D
Gottheimer, Josh
New Jersey · Sep 26, 2019
D
Himes, James A.
Connecticut · Sep 19, 2019
D
Lofgren, Zoe
California · Sep 19, 2019
D
Bishop, Sanford D.
Georgia · Sep 16, 2019
D
Casten, Sean
Illinois · Sep 6, 2019
D
Frankel, Lois
Florida · Sep 6, 2019
D
Houlahan, Chrissy
Pennsylvania · Sep 6, 2019
D
Krishnamoorthi, Raja
Illinois · Sep 6, 2019
D
Doggett, Lloyd
Texas · Aug 27, 2019
D
Barragán, Nanette Diaz
California · Jul 30, 2019
D
Hoyer, Steny H.
Maryland · Jul 30, 2019
D
Davis, Danny K.
Illinois · Jul 25, 2019
D
DelBene, Suzan K.
Washington · Jul 25, 2019
D
Matsui, Doris O.
California · Jul 25, 2019
D
Waters, Maxine
California · Jul 25, 2019
D
Quigley, Mike
Illinois · Jul 22, 2019
D
Garcia, Sylvia R.
Texas · Jul 18, 2019
D
Keating, William R.
Massachusetts · Jul 10, 2019
D
Moulton, Seth
Massachusetts · Jul 10, 2019
D
Schneider, Bradley Scott
Illinois · Jun 26, 2019
D
Stanton, Greg
Arizona · Jun 26, 2019
D
Thompson, Mike
California · Jun 26, 2019
D
Torres, Norma J.
California · Jun 18, 2019
D
Levin, Mike
California · Jun 14, 2019
D
Castor, Kathy
Florida · Jun 13, 2019
D
Schiff, Adam B.
California · Jun 13, 2019
D
Dingell, Debbie
Michigan · Jun 12, 2019
D
Pappas, Chris
New Hampshire · Jun 12, 2019
D
DeGette, Diana
Colorado · Jun 10, 2019
D
Beatty, Joyce
Ohio · Jun 6, 2019
D
Evans, Dwight
Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2019
D
Kelly, Robin L.
Illinois · Jun 4, 2019
D
Welch, Peter
Vermont · Jun 4, 2019
D
Clarke, Yvette D.
New York · May 30, 2019
D
Crow, Jason
Colorado · May 30, 2019
D
Escobar, Veronica
Texas · May 30, 2019
D
Lieu, Ted
California · May 30, 2019
D
Neal, Richard E.
Massachusetts · May 30, 2019
D
Larsen, Rick
Washington · May 28, 2019
D
Gonzalez, Vicente
Texas · May 24, 2019
D
Larson, John B.
Connecticut · May 24, 2019
D
Underwood, Lauren
Illinois · May 24, 2019
D
Kim, Andy
New Jersey · May 23, 2019
D
Brownley, Julia
California · May 21, 2019
R
Van Drew, Jefferson
New Jersey · May 21, 2019
Page 1 of 3 Next