To make clear that the definition of a base period, under the unemployment compensation law of a State, is not an administrative provision subject 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act.
Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.
Declares that the definition of a base period, under the unemployment compensation law of a State, is not an administrative provision subject to a Social Security Act requirement that methods of administration must be found by the Secretary of Labor to be reasonably calculated to insure full payment of unemployment compensation when due. (Provides that, for purposes of this Act, "base period" and "State law" have the same meanings as under the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970.)
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Introduced in House Formatted Text PDF
Cite this page
U.S. Congress. (2026). H.R. 3786: To make clear that the definition of a base period, under the unemployment compensation law of a State, is not an administrative provision subject 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act.. 104th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/104-HR-3786/
"H.R. 3786: To make clear that the definition of a base period, under the unemployment compensation law of a State, is not an administrative provision subject 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act.." 104th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/104-HR-3786/.
H.R. 3786, 104th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/104-HR-3786/.
[H.R. 3786: To make clear that the definition of a base period, under the unemployment compensation law of a State, is not an administrative provision subject 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act.](https://openamerica.io/bill/104-HR-3786/)