Skip to main content
HCONRES 308 97th Congress House Social Welfare Civil Service pensions Federal employees and officials Local and Municipal Government Local officials and employees Old age, survivors and disability insurance State officials and employees States Survivors' benefits

A concurrent resolution expresses the sense of the Congress that any change to section 334 of the Social Security Act amendments of 1977 (P.L. 95-216) not require any beneficiaries to pay back…

Show full title

A concurrent resolution expresses the sense of the Congress that any change to section 334 of the Social Security Act amendments of 1977 (P.L. 95-216) not require any beneficiaries to pay back spouses' and survivors' benefits already received.

Introduced: April 6, 1982 See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
This resolution expired with the 97th Congress
It was not agreed to before the 97th Congress (1981–1982) adjourned, so it is no longer active. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
Apr 12, 1982
Referred to Subcommittee on Social Security.
Apr 6, 1982
Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means.
Apr 6, 1982
Introduced in House
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Expresses the sense of the Congress that if provisions of title II (Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance) of the Social Security Act requiring reduced benefits for spouses receiving government pensions are found to be unconstitutional, any change to such Act should not require beneficiaries to pay back benefits already received and should not eliminate benefits for existing beneficiaries.

What's happening now April 12, 1982

Referred to Subcommittee on Social Security.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2
 Cosponsors 1
All 1 Democratic 1
D
Schumer, Charles E.
New York · Apr 26, 1982
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Con. Res. 308: A concurrent resolution expresses the sense of the Congress that any change to section 334 of the Social Security Act amendments of 1977 (P.L. 95-216) not require any beneficiaries to pay back spouses' and survivors' benefits already received.. 97th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/97-HCONRES-308/
MLA
"H. Con. Res. 308: A concurrent resolution expresses the sense of the Congress that any change to section 334 of the Social Security Act amendments of 1977 (P.L. 95-216) not require any beneficiaries to pay back spouses' and survivors' benefits already received.." 97th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/97-HCONRES-308/.
Bluebook (legal)
H. Con. Res. 308, 97th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/97-HCONRES-308/.
Markdown link
[H. Con. Res. 308: A concurrent resolution expresses the sense of the Congress that any change to section 334 of the Social Security Act amendments of 1977 (P.L. 95-216) not require any beneficiaries to pay back spouses' and survivors' benefits already received.](https://openamerica.io/bill/97-HCONRES-308/)
Report a problem