Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"…
Show full title
Everywhere this bill has been
10 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Agreed to (House)
Apr 8, 2025
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Apr 8, 2025
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473)
Apr 8, 2025
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).
Apr 8, 2025
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)
Apr 8, 2025
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Apr 8, 2025
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.
Apr 8, 2025
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)
Apr 7, 2025
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.
Apr 7, 2025
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
Apr 7, 2025
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.
Votes taken on this bill
2
| Date | Chamber | What was voted on | Result | Yes–No | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2025 | House · vote #92 | On Agreeing to the Resolution | Passed | 213–211 | See who voted → |
| Apr 8, 2025 | House · vote #91 | On Ordering the Previous Question | Passed | 213–211 | See who voted → |
Ask about this bill
Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English — the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.
What's happening now
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Related & companion bills
7
Bill text
2 versions
- Engrossed in House Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
- Reported in House Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Committees of jurisdiction
1
Cite this page
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Res. 294 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.. 119th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/119-HRES-294/
"H. Res. 294 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.." 119th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/119-HRES-294/.
H. Res. 294, 119th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/119-HRES-294/.
[H. Res. 294 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.](https://openamerica.io/bill/119-HRES-294/)