Skip to main content
HR 6547 119th Congress House Finance and Financial Sector Accounting and auditing Bank accounts, deposits, capital Banking and financial institutions regulation Congressional oversight Corporate finance and management Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Performance measurement User charges and fees

Least Cost Exception Act

Introduced: December 10, 2025 Introduced by: Flood, Mike Republican · Nebraska See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 7 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Feb 2, 2026
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.
Feb 2, 2026
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-474.
Dec 17, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 50 - 0.
Dec 17, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Dec 16, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Dec 10, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Dec 10, 2025
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Least Cost Exception Act

This bill allows the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to waive the least-cost resolution requirement for failed insured depository institutions and use alternative methods of resolution, particularly alternatives that do not involve global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).

Under current law, the FDIC must use the resolution method (such as a deposit payoff or the purchase and assumption of a bank’s assets and liabilities) that costs the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund the least to implement when an insured depository institution fails.

The bill provides an exception to this requirement if the following criteria are met:

  • the alternative method is the least costly of all alternatives that do not involve a G-SIB and that do not exceed the cost of liquidation;
  • the difference in cost between the selected alternative and the cost of a resolution involving a purchase and assumption by a G-SIB is less than a maximum cost as established by rule;
  • if the alternative involves a person purchasing assets or assuming liabilities, that person must pay an assessment to the FDIC; and
  • it is determined that the risks to the fund are outweighed by the benefits of limiting the concentration of U.S. banking under G-SIBs.

FDIC must issue a report on any use of the exception established by this bill containing an analysis of the economic impact of cost differences between the selected alternative and the least-cost alternative.

What's happening now February 2, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1