HRES 314
118th Congress
House
Law
Constitution and constitutional amendments
Due process and equal protection
Racial and ethnic relations
Sovereignty, recognition, national governance and status
Supreme Court
U.S. history
U.S. territories and protectorates
Acknowledging that the United States Supreme Court's decisions in the Insular Cases and the "territorial incorporation doctrine" are contrary to the text and history of the United States…
Show full title
Everywhere this bill has been
3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Agreed to (House)
May 22, 2023
Referred to the Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs .
Apr 20, 2023
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Apr 20, 2023
Introduced in House
Ask about this bill
Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.
Plain-English summary
This resolution rejects the Supreme Court's decisions in the Insular Cases (a series of cases regarding the application of constitutional rights in U.S. territories) and recognizes that constitutional and democratic principles apply throughout the states and territories of the United States.
What's happening now
Referred to the Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs .
Bill text
1 version
- Introduced in House Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Committees of jurisdiction
3
Cosponsors
16
D
Stansbury, Melanie A.
D
Johnson, Henry C. "Hank"
Lee, Barbara
Blumenauer, Earl
D
Cohen, Steve
D
Gallego, Ruben
D
García, Jesús G. "Chuy"
D
Huffman, Jared
D
McGovern, James P.
Napolitano, Grace
D
Norton, Eleanor Holmes
D
Plaskett, Stacey E.
D
Soto, Darren
D
Tlaib, Rashida
D
Torres, Ritchie
D
Velázquez, Nydia M.
Cite this page
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Res. 314: Acknowledging that the United States Supreme Court's decisions in the Insular Cases and the "territorial incorporation doctrine" are contrary to the text and history of the United States Constitution, rest on racial views and stereotypes from the era of Plessy v. Ferguson that have long been rejected, are contrary to our Nation's most basic constitutional and democratic principles, and should be rejected as having no place in United States constitutional law.. 118th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/118-HRES-314/
"H. Res. 314: Acknowledging that the United States Supreme Court's decisions in the Insular Cases and the "territorial incorporation doctrine" are contrary to the text and history of the United States Constitution, rest on racial views and stereotypes from the era of Plessy v. Ferguson that have long been rejected, are contrary to our Nation's most basic constitutional and democratic principles, and should be rejected as having no place in United States constitutional law.." 118th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/118-HRES-314/.
H. Res. 314, 118th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/118-HRES-314/.
[H. Res. 314: Acknowledging that the United States Supreme Court's decisions in the Insular Cases and the "territorial incorporation doctrine" are contrary to the text and history of the United States Constitution, rest on racial views and stereotypes from the era of Plessy v. Ferguson that have long been rejected, are contrary to our Nation's most basic constitutional and democratic principles, and should be rejected as having no place in United States constitutional law.](https://openamerica.io/bill/118-HRES-314/)