Skip to main content
HR 3295 118th Congress House Science, Technology, Communications Administrative law and regulatory procedures Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Federal preemption Government information and archives Infrastructure development Judicial review and appeals Rural conditions and development State and local government operations Telephone and wireless communication User charges and fees

BROADBAND Leadership Act

Introduced: May 15, 2023 Introduced by: Griffith, H. Morgan Republican · Virginia See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
May 19, 2023
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
May 15, 2023
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
May 15, 2023
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Barriers and Regulatory Obstacles Avoids Deployment of Broadband Access and Needs Deregulatory Leadership Act or the BROADBAND Leadership Act

This bill limits the authority of a state or locality to regulate the placement, construction, or modification of telecommunications service facilities.

States and localities may not discriminate in such regulations among providers of functionally equivalent services, including based on the technology used to provide services. In addition, they may not regulate in a manner that effectively prohibits the provision or improvement of interstate or intrastate telecommunications services.

However, states and localities may charge reasonable, cost-based fees for (1) reviewing requests to place, construct, or modify telecommunications service facilities; or (2) using property owned or managed by the state or locality for placing, constructing, or modifying those facilities.

Additionally, states or localities must respond to requests for placing, constructing, or modifying facilities and for other actions related to those facilities by specified deadlines. If a decision is not made by the deadline, the request is deemed to be approved. Further, denials of requests must be (1) written, (2) supported by substantial evidence, and (3) publicly released on the same day the decision is made.

An adversely affected person may petition the courts to review the actions of a state or locality, and the courts must review in an expedited manner.

What's happening now May 19, 2023

Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2