Skip to main content
HR 3089 118th Congress House Crime and Law Enforcement Business records Computers and information technology Congressional oversight Consumer affairs Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation Internet, web applications, social media Judicial procedure and administration Right of privacy Telephone and wireless communication

NDO Fairness Act

Introduced: May 5, 2023 Introduced by: Fitzgerald, Scott Republican · Wisconsin See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 16 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
May 16, 2023
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
May 15, 2023
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
May 15, 2023
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 0 (Roll no. 213). (text: CR H2321-2322)
May 15, 2023
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 0 (Roll no. 213). (text: CR H2321-2322)
May 15, 2023
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2330)
May 15, 2023
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
May 15, 2023
DEBATE - The House resumed debate on H. R. 3089.
May 15, 2023
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3089.
May 15, 2023
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2321-2323)
May 15, 2023
Mr. Fitzgerald moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
May 15, 2023
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 37.
May 15, 2023
Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-54.
May 10, 2023
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
May 10, 2023
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
May 5, 2023
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
May 5, 2023
Introduced in House
 Votes taken on this bill 1
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
May 15, 2023 House · vote #213 On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass Passed 4120 See who voted →
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

NDO Fairness Act

This bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders.

Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services (providers) to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers. Further, a provider may notify subscribers or customers of the government's request for records and information unless the government obtains a delayed notification order.

With respect to delayed notification orders, the bill

  • raises the standard for courts to grant a delayed notification order,
  • requires courts to issue delayed notification orders only after issuing a written determination based on specific facts, and
  • requires orders to be narrowly tailored.

Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to delayed notification orders, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; the number of applications for orders; the number of orders granted, extended, or denied; and the number of orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

What's happening now May 16, 2023

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2