Skip to main content
S 1074 117th Congress Senate Commerce Administrative law and regulatory procedures Civil actions and liability Competition and antitrust Corporate finance and management Evidence and witnesses Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Government studies and investigations Internet and video services Internet, web applications, social media Judicial review and appeals Public contracts and procurement Securities

Trust-Busting for the Twenty-First Century Act

Introduced: April 12, 2021 Introduced by: Hawley, Josh Republican · Missouri See on congress.gov
This bill died when the 117th Congress ended
It never became law before the 117th Congress (2021–2022) adjourned, and bills don't carry over to the next Congress. It would have to be reintroduced. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 2 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Apr 12, 2021
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Apr 12, 2021
Introduced in Senate
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Trust-Busting for the Twenty-First Century Act

This bill makes various changes to the federal antitrust statutes and places restrictions on acquisitions involving certain dominant digital firms.

First, the bill revises the evidentiary standards for establishing an illegal monopoly. Under the bill, if a plaintiff establishes the existence of substantial market power or the detrimental effects of particular practices, then the plaintiff need not further establish the scope of the relevant market or the share of the market controlled by the defendant. Further, to prove that the procompetitive effects justify a defendant's conduct the defendant must show by clear and convincing evidence that (1) the procompetitive effects of the conduct outweigh the anticompetitive effects, and (2) the defendant could not obtain substantially similar procompetitive effects through commercially reasonable alternatives. In the case of a violation, courts must order the disgorgement of all profits earned as a result of the conduct.

Next, the bill generally prohibits acquisitions by companies with a market capitalization exceeding $100 billion where the effect of the acquisition may be to lessen competition.

Finally, the Federal Trade Commission may designate as a dominant digital firm a website or online service that the commission determines possesses dominant market power based on specified factors. Acquisitions by such firms in excess of $1 million are presumed unfair trade practices under the bill. Further, a dominant digital firm that provides search functionality must disclose to users any search results are that are promoted or demoted based on whether the search result is affiliated or not affiliated with the firm.

What's happening now April 12, 2021

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). S. 1074: Trust-Busting for the Twenty-First Century Act. 117th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/117-S-1074/
MLA
"S. 1074: Trust-Busting for the Twenty-First Century Act." 117th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/117-S-1074/.
Bluebook (legal)
S. 1074, 117th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/117-S-1074/.
Markdown link
[S. 1074: Trust-Busting for the Twenty-First Century Act](https://openamerica.io/bill/117-S-1074/)
Report a problem