Skip to main content
HR 4569 117th Congress House Public Lands and Natural Resources Environmental assessment, monitoring, research Forests, forestry, trees Wildlife conservation and habitat protection

Action Versus No Action Act

Introduced: July 20, 2021 Introduced by: McClintock, Tom Republican · California See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
This bill died when the 117th Congress ended
It never became law before the 117th Congress (2021–2022) adjourned, and bills don't carry over to the next Congress. It would have to be reintroduced. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Aug 11, 2021
Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry.
Jul 20, 2021
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jul 20, 2021
Introduced in House
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Action Versus No Action Act

This bill limits the scope of certain environmental assessments or impact statements related to forest management activities on National Forest System lands or public lands suitable for timber production to a consideration only of the effects of the forest management activity and the alternative of no action.

Specifically, the bill applies to assessments or impact statements prepared by the Department of Agriculture (USDA), with respect to National Forest System lands, or the Department of the Interior, with respect to public lands, for forest management activities that meet at least one of the criteria specified.

In the case of the alternative of no action, USDA or Interior shall consider whether to evaluate

  • the effect of no action on, among other things, forest health, wildfire potential, insect and disease potential, and timber production; and
  • the implications of a resulting decline in forest health, loss of habitat diversity, wildfire, or insect or disease infestation on potential losses of life and property, domestic water supply in the project area, and wildlife habitat loss.
What's happening now August 11, 2021

Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry.

 Related & companion bills 2
  • HR 4302 Related bill Active Forest Management, Wildfire Prevention and Community Protection Act
  • HR 4614 Related bill Resilient Federal Forests Act
 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 3
 Cosponsors 7
All 7 Republican 7
R
Stauber, Pete
Minnesota · May 11, 2022
 R
Bentz, Cliff
Oregon · Jul 20, 2021
 R
Boebert, Lauren
Colorado · Jul 20, 2021
 R
Newhouse, Dan
Washington · Jul 20, 2021
 R
Obernolte, Jay
California · Jul 20, 2021
 R
Tiffany, Thomas P.
Wisconsin · Jul 20, 2021
 R
Westerman, Bruce
Arkansas · Jul 20, 2021
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H.R. 4569: Action Versus No Action Act. 117th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/117-HR-4569/
MLA
"H.R. 4569: Action Versus No Action Act." 117th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/117-HR-4569/.
Bluebook (legal)
H.R. 4569, 117th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/117-HR-4569/.
Markdown link
[H.R. 4569: Action Versus No Action Act](https://openamerica.io/bill/117-HR-4569/)
Report a problem