Skip to main content
HR 3814 117th Congress House Environmental Protection Accounting and auditing Administrative law and regulatory procedures Air quality Civil actions and liability Climate change and greenhouse gases Congressional oversight Environmental assessment, monitoring, research Environmental regulatory procedures Evidence and witnesses Executive agency funding and structure Federal district courts Government information and archives Intergovernmental relations Judicial procedure and administration Judicial review and appeals Jurisdiction and venue Legal fees and court costs Licensing and registrations State and local government operations

UNSHACKLE Act

Introduced: June 11, 2021 See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 5 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Nov 1, 2022
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Jun 14, 2021
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment and Climate Change.
Jun 14, 2021
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Jun 11, 2021
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jun 11, 2021
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Undoing NEPA’s Substantial Harm by Advancing Concepts that Kickstart the Liberation of the Economy Act or the UNSHACKLE Act

This bill revises the environmental review process required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), including by

  • establishing deadlines for federal agencies to complete reviews of the environmental effects of proposed major federal actions;
  • establishing penalties for agencies that do not comply with these deadlines;
  • limiting the number of assessment documents required for proposed major federal actions, requiring agencies to reuse certain research or documents, and allowing agencies to adopt environmental documents prepared by states or third parties;
  • requiring agencies to only consider alternatives to proposed actions that are technically and economically feasible;
  • prohibiting agencies from considering whether proposed actions or alternatives to those actions will have an effect on climate change; and
  • establishing requirements concerning the judicial review of NEPA cases.
What's happening now November 1, 2022

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.

 Committees of jurisdiction 7