Skip to main content
S 1273 116th Congress Senate Commerce Administrative remedies Alternative dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration Congressional agencies Evidence and witnesses Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management Government information and archives Government studies and investigations Intellectual property Judicial review and appeals Library of Congress

CASE Act of 2019

Introduced: May 1, 2019 Introduced by: Kennedy, John Republican · Louisiana See on congress.gov
This bill died when the 116th Congress ended
It never became law before the 116th Congress (2019–2020) adjourned, and bills don't carry over to the next Congress. It would have to be reintroduced. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 5 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Sep 12, 2019
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 206.
Sep 12, 2019
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Graham without amendment. With written report No. 116-105.
Jul 18, 2019
Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
May 1, 2019
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
May 1, 2019
Introduced in Senate
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2019 or the CASE Act of 2019

This bill creates the Copyright Claims Board, a body within the U.S. Copyright Office, to decide copyright disputes. Damages awarded by the board are capped at $30,000.

Participation in board proceedings is voluntary with an opt-out procedure for defendants, and parties may choose instead to have a dispute heard in court. If the parties agree to have their dispute heard by the board, they shall forego the right to be heard before a court and the right to a jury trial. Board proceedings shall have no effect on class actions.

The board shall be authorized to hear copyright infringement claims, actions for a declaration of noninfringement, claims that a party knowingly sent false takedown notices, and related counterclaims.

The bill provides for various procedures, including with respect to requests for information from the other party and requests for the board to reconsider a decision.

The board may issue monetary awards based on actual or statutory damages.

The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs except where there is bad faith misconduct.

A board's final determination precludes relitigating the claims in court or at the board. Parties may challenge a board decision in federal district court only if (1) the decision was a result of fraud, corruption, or other misconduct; (2) the board exceeded its authority or failed to render a final determination; or (3) in a default ruling or failure to prosecute, the default or failure was excusable.

What's happening now September 12, 2019

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 206.

 Related & companion bills 2
 Bill text 2 versions

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). S. 1273: CASE Act of 2019. 116th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/116-S-1273/
MLA
"S. 1273: CASE Act of 2019." 116th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/116-S-1273/.
Bluebook (legal)
S. 1273, 116th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/116-S-1273/.
Markdown link
[S. 1273: CASE Act of 2019](https://openamerica.io/bill/116-S-1273/)
Report a problem