Skip to main content
HRES 1082 116th Congress House Health Cardiovascular and respiratory health Emergency medical services and trauma care Health care costs and insurance Health care coverage and access Health programs administration and funding Infectious and parasitic diseases Judicial review and appeals

Expressing the sense of the House that the Department of Justice should defend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148…

Show full title

Expressing the sense of the House that the Department of Justice should defend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148; 124 Stat. 119) and halt its efforts to repeal, sabotage, or undermine health care protections for millions of people in the United States in the midst of the public health emergency relating to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Introduced: September 11, 2020 See on congress.gov
This resolution expired with the 116th Congress
It was not agreed to before the 116th Congress (2019–2020) adjourned, so it is no longer active. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 2 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Agreed to (House)
Aug 11, 2020
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Aug 11, 2020
Introduced in House
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the Department of Justice (DOJ) should defend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in ongoing litigation. Currently, DOJ supports the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that upheld a district court ruling that certain provisions of the PPACA are not severable from the remainder of the Act and therefore that the entire law is invalid. The Fifth Circuit's ruling is currently pending appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court.

What's happening now August 11, 2020

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

 Related & companion bills 1
 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1
 Cosponsors 94
D
Levin, Mike
California · Sep 30, 2020
D
Casten, Sean
Illinois · Sep 11, 2020
D
Doggett, Lloyd
Texas · Sep 11, 2020
HASTINGS, ALCEE
· Sep 11, 2020
D
Horsford, Steven
Nevada · Sep 11, 2020
D
Larson, John B.
Connecticut · Sep 11, 2020
Levin, Andy
· Sep 11, 2020
Malinowski, Tom
· Sep 11, 2020
D
McBath, Lucy
Georgia · Sep 11, 2020
D
Trahan, Lori
Massachusetts · Sep 11, 2020
Butterfield, G. K.
· Sep 4, 2020
D
Castor, Kathy
Florida · Sep 4, 2020
D
Matsui, Doris O.
California · Sep 4, 2020
McNerney, Jerry
· Sep 4, 2020
D
Schakowsky, Janice D.
Illinois · Sep 4, 2020
Brown, Anthony
· Aug 28, 2020
D
Frankel, Lois
Florida · Aug 21, 2020
Fudge, Marcia
· Aug 21, 2020
Lawrence, Brenda
· Aug 21, 2020
ENGEL, ELIOT
· Aug 14, 2020
D
Gonzalez, Vicente
Texas · Aug 14, 2020
Higgins, Brian
· Aug 14, 2020
D
Neguse, Joe
Colorado · Aug 14, 2020
D
Panetta, Jimmy
California · Aug 14, 2020
D
Pingree, Chellie
Maine · Aug 14, 2020
D
Sánchez, Linda T.
California · Aug 14, 2020
Sarbanes, John
· Aug 14, 2020
D
Stanton, Greg
Arizona · Aug 14, 2020
Axne, Cynthia
· Aug 11, 2020
D
Barragán, Nanette Diaz
California · Aug 11, 2020
D
Bishop, Sanford D.
Georgia · Aug 11, 2020
D
Blunt Rochester, Lisa
Delaware · Aug 11, 2020
D
Boyle, Brendan F.
Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 2020
Bustos, Cheri
· Aug 11, 2020
D
Carson, André
Indiana · Aug 11, 2020
D
Chu, Judy
California · Aug 11, 2020
D
Cisneros, Gilbert Ray
California · Aug 11, 2020
D
Cohen, Steve
Tennessee · Aug 11, 2020
COOPER, JAMES
· Aug 11, 2020
D
Costa, Jim
California · Aug 11, 2020
D
Crow, Jason
Colorado · Aug 11, 2020
D
Davids, Sharice
Kansas · Aug 11, 2020
D
Davis, Danny K.
Illinois · Aug 11, 2020
DEFAZIO, PETER
· Aug 11, 2020
D
DeGette, Diana
Colorado · Aug 11, 2020
D
DeLauro, Rosa L.
Connecticut · Aug 11, 2020
Deutch, Theodore
· Aug 11, 2020
D
Dingell, Debbie
Michigan · Aug 11, 2020
D
Escobar, Veronica
Texas · Aug 11, 2020
D
Espaillat, Adriano
New York · Aug 11, 2020
Page 1 of 2 Next
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Res. 1082: Expressing the sense of the House that the Department of Justice should defend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148; 124 Stat. 119) and halt its efforts to repeal, sabotage, or undermine health care protections for millions of people in the United States in the midst of the public health emergency relating to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).. 116th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/116-HRES-1082/
MLA
"H. Res. 1082: Expressing the sense of the House that the Department of Justice should defend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148; 124 Stat. 119) and halt its efforts to repeal, sabotage, or undermine health care protections for millions of people in the United States in the midst of the public health emergency relating to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).." 116th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/116-HRES-1082/.
Bluebook (legal)
H. Res. 1082, 116th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/116-HRES-1082/.
Markdown link
[H. Res. 1082: Expressing the sense of the House that the Department of Justice should defend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148; 124 Stat. 119) and halt its efforts to repeal, sabotage, or undermine health care protections for millions of people in the United States in the midst of the public health emergency relating to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).](https://openamerica.io/bill/116-HRES-1082/)
Report a problem