Skip to main content
HR 3666 116th Congress House Commerce Administrative remedies Civil actions and liability Congressional oversight Department of Commerce Employment and training programs Evidence and witnesses Executive agency funding and structure Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Federal district courts Federal preemption Fraud offenses and financial crimes Government information and archives Government trust funds Higher education Intellectual property Judges Judicial procedure and administration Judicial review and appeals Licensing and registrations

STRONGER Patents Act of 2019

Introduced: July 10, 2019 See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 4 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Jul 30, 2019
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
Jul 11, 2019
Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce.
Jul 10, 2019
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jul 10, 2019
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Support Technology and Research for Our Nation's Growth and Economic Resilience Patents Act of 2019 or the STRONGER Patents Act of 2019

This bill makes several patent-related changes, including with respect to how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) conducts administrative patent validity reviews.

When deciding inter partes reviews (IPRs) and post-grant reviews (PGRs), the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) shall give patent claim terms their ordinary and customary meanings as understood by a person of ordinary skill in the relevant art (the same standard used in court). If a court has already construed a patent claim, the USPTO shall consider that construction.

The bill makes various changes relating to such proceedings, such as by (1) raising the burden of proof to invalidate a patent claim; (2) establishing that a challenged patent claim is presumed valid; (3) imposing standing requirements as to who may file an IPR or PGR, where none currently exist except for some timing requirements; (4) restricting when multiple challenges may be filed against the same patent; and (5) limiting IPRs and PGRs when a court or the International Trade Commission has ruled on the obviousness or novelty of the same patent claims.

This bill also (1) makes it easier to get an injunction after a court finding of the infringement of a valid patent, by a presumption that further infringement would cause irreparable injury and the remedies available at law are inadequate; (2) authorizes the USPTO to keep and spend the fees that it collects; and (3) makes bad faith patent demand letters an unfair or deceptive act in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

What's happening now July 30, 2019

Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.

 Committees of jurisdiction 4