Skip to main content
S 1451 115th Congress Senate Transportation and Public Works Administrative law and regulatory procedures Business records Congressional oversight Department of Transportation Government information and archives Public participation and lobbying Railroads Transportation employees Transportation programs funding Transportation safety and security

RAILS Act

Introduced: June 28, 2017 Introduced by: Fischer, Deb Republican · Nebraska See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 2 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Jun 28, 2017
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Jun 28, 2017
Introduced in Senate
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Railroad Advancement of Innovation and Leadership with Safety Act or the RAILS Act

This bill seeks to promote alternative approaches to railroad safety through self-regulation.

Specifically, the Department of Transportation (DOT) shall:

  • before proposing or adopting a rule, consider an approach that specifies performance objectives rather than identifies or requires the specific manner of compliance that a regulated entity must adopt;
  • before issuing a proposed rule, publish an advance notice of proposed rulemaking unless the proposed rule is not likely to result in a "significant rule" (i.e., a rule that has an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or meets other specified criteria);
  • before issuing any proposed rule or final rule, conduct a regulatory impact analysis to evaluate the proposed rule or final rule;
  • by June 1, 2019, and at least every five years thereafter, complete a comprehensive review of the regulations, orders, and guidance documents issued; and
  • include, in each significant rule prescribed on or after December 31, 2017, a framework for assessing the rule's effects.

DOT may waive compliance with any part of a regulation prescribed or order issued if the waiver: (1) is in the public interest; (2) requires the recipient to adopt an alternative technology, practice, or system that could achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than that which would be obtained in the absence of the waiver; and (3) includes a DOT-approved evaluation framework.

What's happening now June 28, 2017

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1