Skip to main content
S 1233 115th Congress Senate Transportation and Public Works Administrative law and regulatory procedures Administrative remedies Competition and antitrust Energy prices Executive agency funding and structure Motor fuels Public participation and lobbying Railroads Surface Transportation Board Transportation costs

Rail Shipper Fairness Act of 2017

Introduced: May 25, 2017 Introduced by: Baldwin, Tammy Democratic · Wisconsin See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
 Everywhere this bill has been 2 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
May 25, 2017
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
May 25, 2017
Introduced in Senate
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Rail Shipper Fairness Act of 2017

This bill amends federal transportation law to: (1) require rail transportation service to be efficient and reliable based on a shipper's reasonable service requirements, and (2) expand enumerated U.S. transportation policies to provide for and promote the protection of the shipping public.

The Surface Transportation Board (STB) may:

  • issue emergency service orders that include rail carrier shipments moving under contract if such shipments are part of a regional service order; and
  • require reports, service plans, or other documents that cover shipments moving under contract.

Rail carriers shall be liable for damages or equitable relief as a result of inadequate or deficient service. Civil penalties for rail carriers who violate certain federal requirements are increased from $5,000 to $25,000 per violation.

The bill allows shippers to obtain rates to or from any interchange points within 100 miles of two or more rail carriers (i.e., competitive switching).

The STB shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to develop a market-based revenue methodology for determining the reasonableness of challenged rail rates.

A rail carrier must compute fuel surcharges in accordance with changes in actual fuel prices, rather than using an index.

The STB must: (1) suspend collection of rate increases in stand-alone cost cases while a rate case is pending, and (2) replace its revenue adequacy test for rail carriers with a formula for calculating a carrier's cost of capital.

What's happening now May 25, 2017

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1