Skip to main content
HR 2213 115th Congress House Government Operations and Politics Border security and unlawful immigration Congressional oversight Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation Department of Homeland Security Employee hiring Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management Law enforcement officers Military personnel and dependents National Guard and reserves Veterans' education, employment, rehabilitation

Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act of 2017

Introduced: April 27, 2017 See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
 Everywhere this bill has been 20 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Jun 8, 2017
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Jun 7, 2017
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 374, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lujan Grisham (NM) amendment.
Jun 7, 2017
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Jun 7, 2017
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 282 - 137 (Roll no. 294). (text: CR H4676-4677)
Jun 7, 2017
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 282 - 137 (Roll no. 294).(text: CR H4676-4677)
Jun 7, 2017
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4687-4688)
Jun 7, 2017
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of the debate on the Lujan Grisham amendment, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McCaul requested the Yeas and Nays and pursuant to the order of the House of June 7, 2017 the Chair postponed further proceedings on the adoption of the Lujan Grisham amendment until a time to be announced.
Jun 7, 2017
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Jun 7, 2017
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. McCaul asked unanimous consent that the question of adopting the amendment to H.R. 2213 may be subject to postponement as though under clause 8 of rule 20. Agreed to without objection.
Jun 7, 2017
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2213.
Jun 7, 2017
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2213 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.
Jun 7, 2017
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 374. (consideration: CR H4676-4684)
Jun 7, 2017
Rule H. Res. 374 passed House.
Jun 6, 2017
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 374 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2213 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.
May 16, 2017
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 74.
May 16, 2017
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 115-121.
May 3, 2017
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
May 3, 2017
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Apr 27, 2017
Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Apr 27, 2017
Introduced in House
 Votes taken on this bill 1
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
Jun 7, 2017 House · vote #294 On Passage Passed 282–137 See who voted →
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act of 2017

(Sec. 2) This bill amends the Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 to expand the authority of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to waive the administration of polygraph examinations to civilian and military applicants for law enforcement positions in the CBP. This expanded waiver authority terminates five years after the enactment of this bill.

(Sec. 3) An individual who receives such a waiver is not exempt from other hiring requirements relating to suitability for employment and eligibility to hold a national security designated position.

Any individual who receives a waiver and holds a current Tier 4 (High Risk Public Trust) background investigation shall be subject to a Tier 5 (Critical Sensitive and Special Sensitive National Security) background investigation.

The CBP may administer a polygraph examination to an applicant or employee who receives a waiver if information is discovered prior to the completion of a background investigation that results in a determination that a polygraph examination is necessary to make a final determination regarding suitability for employment or continued employment.

The CBP shall provide Congress information on the number of waivers requested, granted, and denied, and the reasons for any such denial, and the final outcome of the application for employment at issue. Such information shall also include the number of instances a polygraph examination was administered, the result of any such examination, and the final outcome of the application for employment at issue.

What's happening now June 8, 2017

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2
 Cosponsors 5
All 5 Democratic 2 Republican 3