Skip to main content
S 2966 114th Congress Senate Government Operations and Politics District of Columbia Government ethics and transparency, public corruption Government information and archives Judges Judicial procedure and administration Legal fees and court costs State and local courts State and local government operations

District of Columbia Judicial Financial Transparency Act

Introduced: May 23, 2016 Introduced by: Lankford, James Republican · Oklahoma See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 5 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Sep 27, 2016
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 645.
Sep 27, 2016
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Johnson with amendments. With written report No. 114-359.
May 25, 2016
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
May 23, 2016
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
May 23, 2016
Introduced in Senate
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

District of Columbia Judicial Financial Transparency Act

(Sec. 2) This bill amends the District of Columbia Code to revise the financial disclosure requirements for District of Columbia judges. The revisions establish new dollar thresholds and requirements for reporting to the District of Columbia Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure the financial interests of the judges and specified family members with respect to:

  • income;
  • dividends, rents, interest, and capital gains;
  • liabilities;
  • gifts;
  • real and personal property;
  • honoraria;
  • expense accounts or reimbursements for expenses; and
  • waivers or partial waivers of fees or charges.

The financial disclosure reports must be available for public inspection and copying, unless revealing personal and sensitive information could endanger the judge or a family member. A report may be redacted only: (1) to the extent necessary to protect the individual or family member, and (2) as long as the danger to the individual exists.

(Sec. 3) The Probate Divisions of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia may use magistrate judges.

(Sec. 4) DC courts may accept payment of fines, fees, escrow payments, restitution, bonds, and other payments by credit card or electronic funds transfer. The executive officer of the courts may contract with a bank or credit card vendor, or other third party provider, to accept such payments, making every effort to find the lowest cost vendor among them.

(Sec. 5) The maximum amount in controversy for cases under the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of DC Superior Court shall increase from $5,000 to $10,000.

(Sec. 6) Each chief judge of the Superior Court or of the Court of Appeals, as appropriate, may delegate to an active or senior judge (in the court in which the chief judge sits) the authority to approve any compensation for court-appointed criminal defense or child abuse and neglect attorneys exceeding the usual maximum.

What's happening now September 27, 2016

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 645.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1