Skip to main content
HRES 585 114th Congress House Transportation and Public Works Intergovernmental relations Michigan North Carolina Ohio Public-private cooperation Roads and highways South Carolina State and local government operations Transportation programs funding Virginia West Virginia

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding an Interstate 73 corridor transportation compact.

Introduced: January 13, 2016 See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
 Everywhere this bill has been 4 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Feb 3, 2016
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Jan 14, 2016
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Jan 13, 2016
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 13, 2016
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the entering into of an agreement or compact by two or more states for cooperative effort and mutual assistance would be beneficial to the development of an Interstate 73 corridor.

Such an agreement may incorporate the following elements to the extent that they are consistent with federal law:

  • the study, development, and promotion of a plan for the design, construction, financing, and operation of such corridor through South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, and Michigan;
  • coordination of efforts to establish a common legal framework in all the signatory states to authorize and facilitate design, construction, financing, and operation of such corridor or through public-private partnerships;
  • advocacy for federal funding to support the establishment of such corridor;
  • making available to the corridor project funding and resources that are or may be appropriated by the signatory states and allocated for that purpose; and
  • doing all things necessary or convenient to facilitate and coordinate the corridor's design, construction, financing, and operation.
What's happening now February 3, 2016

Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.

 Committees of jurisdiction 4
 Cosponsors 4
All 4 Democratic 2 Republican 2