Financial Institution Customer Protection Act of 2015
| Date | Chamber | What was voted on | Result | Yes–No | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2016 | House · vote #63 | On Passage | Passed | 250–169 | See who voted → |
| Feb 4, 2016 | House · vote #62 | On Motion to Recommit with Instructions | Failed | 177–240 | See who voted → |
Amendments propose changes to this bill. Members vote on amendments separately before the final bill vote. An agreed amendment becomes part of the bill; a failed amendment does not.
2 agreed to
| Amendment | Sponsor | Status |
|---|---|---|
| HAMDT 928 | Gosar, Paul A. | Agreed to |
| HAMDT 927 | Sherman, Brad | Agreed to |
Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.
Financial Institution Customer Protection Act of 2016
(Sec. 2) This bill prohibits a federal banking agency from formally or informally suggesting, requesting, or ordering a depository institution to terminate either a specific customer account, or group of customer accounts, or otherwise restrict or discourage it from entering into or maintaining a banking relationship with a specific customer or group of customers, unless: (1) the agency has a material reason to do so, and (2) the reason is not based solely on reputation risk.
The "material reason" criterion shall be satisfied if an agency believes that a specific customer or group of customers poses a threat to national security, including any belief that they are involved in terrorist financing.
Unless the appropriate agency determines that the customer or group of customers has used due diligence to avoid doing business with any entity described below, the bill deems the criteria addressing "material reason" to be met if the agency believes a customer or group of customers is, or is acting as, a conduit for an entity which:
- poses a threat to national security;
- is involved in terrorist financing;
- is an agency of the government of Iran, North Korea, Syria, or any country listed from time to time on the State Sponsors of Terrorism list;
- is either located in, or subject to the jurisdiction of, any of such countries; or
- does business with any entity located in such countries.
If an appropriate federal banking agency orders a depository institution to terminate a specific customer account or a group of customer accounts, the depository institution shall inform the customer or customers of the justification for the termination.
No notice may be given to the customer, however, if the agency requests or orders a depository institution to terminate a customer account (or a group of customer accounts) based upon a belief that customer or those customers pose a threat to national security or are otherwise described above.
(Sec. 3) The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 is amended to revise requirements for summoning witnesses and requiring production of books or other records the Attorney General deems relevant or material to a civil investigation in contemplation of a civil proceeding which may result in civil penalties for specified violations.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Engrossed in House Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
- Introduced in House Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
- Referred in Senate Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
- Reported in House Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Cite this page
U.S. Congress. (2026). H.R. 766: Financial Institution Customer Protection Act of 2016. 114th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/114-HR-766/
"H.R. 766: Financial Institution Customer Protection Act of 2016." 114th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/114-HR-766/.
H.R. 766, 114th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/114-HR-766/.
[H.R. 766: Financial Institution Customer Protection Act of 2016](https://openamerica.io/bill/114-HR-766/)