Skip to main content
HR 527 114th Congress House Government Operations and Politics Administrative law and regulatory procedures Administrative remedies Business records Civil actions and liability Competitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits Congressional oversight Economic performance and conditions Federal appellate courts Federal-Indian relations Forests, forestry, trees Government information and archives Government studies and investigations Industrial policy and productivity Judicial review and appeals Jurisdiction and venue Land use and conservation Small Business Administration Small business Tax administration and collection, taxpayers

Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act of 2015

Introduced: January 26, 2015 See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 32 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Feb 9, 2015
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Feb 5, 2015
Mr. Deutch moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on the Judiciary. (consideration: CR H831-833; text: CR H831-832)
Feb 5, 2015
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H831)
Feb 5, 2015
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Feb 5, 2015
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 260 - 163 (Roll no. 68).
Feb 5, 2015
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 260 - 163 (Roll no. 68).
Feb 5, 2015
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 182 - 240 (Roll no. 67).
Feb 5, 2015
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H832)
Feb 5, 2015
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Deutch motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add at the end of the bill the following section pertaining to Preventing the Spread of Nuclear Weapons.
Feb 5, 2015
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 527.
Feb 5, 2015
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption until a time to be announced.
Feb 5, 2015
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 78, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee Part A amendment no. 6.
Feb 5, 2015
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 78, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Johnson(GA) Part A amendment no. 5.
Feb 5, 2015
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Schrader amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Schrader demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption until a time to be announced.
Feb 5, 2015
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 78, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Schrader Part A amendment no. 4.
Feb 5, 2015
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 78, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Conyers Part A amendment no. 3.
Feb 5, 2015
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 78, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters Part A amendment no. 1.
Feb 5, 2015
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 527.
Feb 5, 2015
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 78 and Rule XVIII.
Feb 5, 2015
For H.R. 527, the rule provides for one hour of debate; makes in order as original text the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in Rules Committee Print 114-3; and makes specified additional amendments in order. For H.R. 50, the rule provides for one hour of debate; provides that an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 114-4, modified by the amendment printed in Part B of the report shall be considered as adopted. Further specified amendments are in order.
Feb 5, 2015
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 78. (consideration: CR H816-834; text of the amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H822-825)
Feb 5, 2015
The Speaker designated the Honorable Lynn A. Westmoreland to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Feb 3, 2015
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 78 Reported to House. For H.R. 527, the rule provides for one hour of debate; makes in order as original text the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in Rules Committee Print 114-3; and makes specified additional amendments in order. For H.R. 50, the rule provides for one hour of debate; provides that an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 114-4, modified by the amendment printed in Part B of the report shall be considered as adopted. Further specified amendments are in order.
Feb 2, 2015
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 8.
Feb 2, 2015
Committee on Small Business discharged.
Feb 2, 2015
Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 114-12, Part I.
Jan 27, 2015
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 8.
Jan 27, 2015
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Jan 27, 2015
Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law Discharged.
Jan 26, 2015
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 26, 2015
Introduced in House
Jan 26, 2015
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
 Votes taken on this bill 2
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
Feb 5, 2015 House · vote #68 On Passage Passed 260163 See who voted →
Feb 5, 2015 House · vote #67 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions Failed 182240 See who voted →
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act of 2015

This bill modifies the rule making requirements and procedures of federal agencies (excluding Congress, U.S. courts, U.S. territories and possession, and the District of Columbia) under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) and the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). The definition of "rule" under RFA is expanded to include all agency rules, except for rules that pertain to the protection of the rights of and benefits for veterans or rules of particular (and not general) applicability relating to rates, wages, and other financial indicators. Under a new definition of "economic impact," agencies are required to consider any direct economic effect of a proposed rule on small entities and any indirect economic effect on small entities that is reasonably foreseeable and that results from such rule.

Under the bill, agencies are required to modify their rulemaking procedures to:

  • include within initial and final regulatory flexibility analyses a detailed statement of information relating to a proposed rule;
  • include in the agency regulatory flexibility agenda a description of the sector of the North American Industrial Classification System that is affected by a proposed agency rule that is likely to have a significant economic impact of a substantial number of small entities;
  • require each initial regulatory flexibility analysis to contain detailed information about a proposed rule, including why agency action is being considered, the objectives and legal basis for the proposed rule, and an estimate of the number and types of small entities to which the proposed rule will apply;
  • eliminate waivers or delays of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis;
  • modify the procedures for participation of small entities in the promulgation of a proposed rule and the review panel advocacy process; and
  • publish a plan for the periodic review of existing rules and new rules that have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities to determine whether such rules should be continued, changed, or rescinded.

Judicial review of an agency final rule for compliance with RFA requirements is allowed after the publication of such rule, instead of after completion of the rulemaking process.

The Small Business Act is amended to authorize the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to make small business size standard determinations for all purposes other than for the purposes of such Act or the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

SBREFA is amended to require agencies, in preparing small entity compliance guides, to solicit input from affected small entities or associations of small entities.

The Comptroller General must complete and publish a study that examines whether the SBA Chief Counsel for Advocacy has the capacity and resources to carry out duties under this Act.

What's happening now February 9, 2015

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

 Committees of jurisdiction 4