Skip to main content
HR 4802 114th Congress House Health Administrative law and regulatory procedures Administrative remedies Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation Department of Health and Human Services Fraud offenses and financial crimes Government studies and investigations Intergovernmental relations Medicaid State and local government operations

Medicaid Program Integrity Enhancement Act of 2016

Introduced: March 17, 2016 Introduced by: Luján, Ben Ray Democratic · New Mexico See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Mar 18, 2016
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Mar 17, 2016
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Mar 17, 2016
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Medicaid Program Integrity Enhancement Act of 2016

This bill amends title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act to require a state Medicaid agency to establish a process by which a provider may appeal a decision by the agency to suspend payment to the provider on the basis of credible fraud allegations.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) must revise specified regulations related to such suspensions in order to comply with due process requirements established by the bill.

Specifically, a state Medicaid agency may not suspend payment until the agency: (1) consults with the state's Medicaid fraud control unit or, if the state has no such unit, with the state's attorney general; (2) certifies that it has considered whether the suspension will jeopardize beneficiary access and whether there is good cause not to suspend payment; and (3) furnishes the provider with the agency's reasons for finding no such good cause.

Furthermore, the agency must periodically evaluate whether there is good cause to discontinue a suspension for which an investigation is pending. With specified exceptions, such good cause shall be deemed to exist if the investigation remains unresolved after a suspension has been in effect for 18 months.

CMS must also revise specified regulations to provide that an allegation of fraud shall be considered credible only if the allegation has indications of reliability and the state Medicaid agency: (1) has reviewed all allegations, facts, and evidence carefully; (2) acts judiciously on a case-by-case basis; and (3) has considered the potential impact a payment suspension may have on beneficiary access to care.

What's happening now March 18, 2016

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2