HR 4321 114th Congress House Government Operations and Politics Appropriations Civil actions and liability Congressional-executive branch relations Constitution and constitutional amendments Firearms and explosives Intergovernmental relations Law enforcement administration and funding Members of Congress Presidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents State and local government operations

Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection Act

Introduced: January 12, 2016 Introduced by: Stutzman, Marlin A. Republican · Indiana See on congress.gov

Everywhere this bill has been 4 steps

Introduced

In committee

Reported out

Passed House

Passed Senate

To President

Became law

Feb 3, 2016

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.

Jan 6, 2016

Introduced in House

Jan 6, 2016

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Jan 6, 2016

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H94-95)

Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection Act

This bill expresses the sense of Congress that any executive order, memoranda, proclamation, or signing statement issued by the President that infringes on the powers and duties of Congress under article I, section 8 of the Constitution or the Second Amendment, or that would require the expenditure of federal funds not specifically appropriated for such executive action, is advisory only and has no force or effect unless enacted as law.

The bill nullifies any such executive action and prohibits the use of appropriated funds to promulgate or enforce any such action.

The following persons may bring a civil action in an appropriate U.S. district court to challenge the validity of any such executive action: (1) any Member or either or both chambers of Congress, (2) the highest governmental official of any state or political subdivision if the challenged action infringes on a power of such state under any congressional enactment or relevant treaty, and (3) any person aggrieved of the challenged executive action with respect to a liberty or property interest adversely affected directly by the executive action.

What's happening now February 3, 2016

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.

Related & companion bills 1

Bill text 1 version