Skip to main content
HR 367 113th Congress House Government Operations and Politics Administrative law and regulatory procedures Business investment and capital Climate change and greenhouse gases Competitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits Congressional oversight Economic performance and conditions Industrial policy and productivity Inflation and prices Judicial review and appeals Legislative rules and procedure Unemployment

Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013

Introduced: January 23, 2013 Introduced by: Young, Todd Republican · Indiana See on congress.gov
This bill died when the 113th Congress ended
It never became law before the 113th Congress (2013–2014) adjourned, and bills don't carry over to the next Congress. It would have to be reintroduced. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 49 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Sep 9, 2013
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Aug 2, 2013
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Aug 2, 2013
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 232 - 183 (Roll no. 445).
Aug 2, 2013
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 185 - 229 (Roll no. 444).
Aug 2, 2013
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H5359)
Aug 2, 2013
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kuster motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House forthwith with an amendment to add a section to the bill titled "Protecting Jobs, Economic Growth, and the Health and Safety of the American Public".
Aug 2, 2013
Ms. Kuster moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary. (consideration: CR H5358-5360; text: CR H5358)
Aug 2, 2013
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Aug 2, 2013
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H5358)
Aug 2, 2013
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 367.
Aug 2, 2013
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postopned.
Aug 2, 2013
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Aug 2, 2013
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5353-5360)
Aug 1, 2013
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 367 as unfinished business.
Aug 1, 2013
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Aug 1, 2013
Mr. Goodlatte moved that the Committee rise.
Aug 1, 2013
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Moore amendment No. 12, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Moore demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moore amendment No. 12.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Webster amendment No. 11.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McKinley amendment No. 9.
Aug 1, 2013
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment No. 8, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 8.
Aug 1, 2013
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Johnson (GA) amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Johnson (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Johnson (GA) amendment No. 7.
Aug 1, 2013
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Nadler amendment No. 6, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Nadler demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Nadler amendment No. 6.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Sessions amendment No. 5.
Aug 1, 2013
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Latham amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Johnson (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Latham amendment No. 4.
Aug 1, 2013
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Smith(MO) amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Smith (MO) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Smith (MO) amendment No. 3.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rodney Davis (IL) amendment No. 2.
Aug 1, 2013
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Scalise amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Scalise demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Aug 1, 2013
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Scalise amendment No. 1.
Aug 1, 2013
The Committee of the Whole resumed its sitting and continued with debate on H.R. 367.
Aug 1, 2013
The Committee of the Whole rose informally to receive a message from the Senate.
Aug 1, 2013
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 367.
Aug 1, 2013
The Speaker designated the Honorable Randy Hultgren to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Aug 1, 2013
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 322 and Rule XVIII.
Aug 1, 2013
In each case the rule provides for one hour of debate on the bill and one motion to recommit for each bill.
Aug 1, 2013
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 322. (consideration: CR H5306-5309, H5309-5332; text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H5315-5317)
Jul 31, 2013
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 322 Reported to House. In each case the rule provides for one hour of debate on the bill and one motion to recommit for each bill.
Jul 19, 2013
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 115.
Jul 19, 2013
Committee on Budget discharged.
Jul 19, 2013
Committee on Rules discharged.
Jul 19, 2013
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 113-160, Part I.
Apr 11, 2013
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 9.
Apr 11, 2013
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Mar 20, 2013
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 6 - 3 .
 Votes taken on this bill 2
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
Aug 2, 2013 House · vote #445 On Passage Passed 232183 See who voted →
Aug 2, 2013 House · vote #444 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions Failed 185229 See who voted →
 Amendments to this bill 11

Amendments propose changes to this bill. Members vote on amendments separately before the final bill vote. An agreed amendment becomes part of the bill; a failed amendment does not.

7 agreed to 4 failed

AmendmentSponsorPurposeStatusLatest action
HAMDT 458 Moore, Gwen Amendment sought to exempt rules pertaining to veterans from the provisions of the bill. Failed Aug 2, 2013
HAMDT 455 Amendment sought to exempt from the bill's Congressional approval requirement any rule promulgated by the Dep… Failed Aug 2, 2013
HAMDT 454 Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" Amendment sought to exempt from the provisions of the bill any rule that the Office of Management and Budget … Failed Aug 2, 2013
HAMDT 453 Nadler, Jerrold Amendment sought to exempt from the bill's Congressional approval requirement any rule pertaining to nuclear … Failed Aug 2, 2013
HAMDT 451 Amendment clarifies that the report required to be submitted to Congress by Federal agencies promulgating a r… Agreed to Aug 2, 2013
HAMDT 450 Smith, Jason Amendment requires Congressional approval for all rules under the authority of the Affordable Care Act. Agreed to Aug 2, 2013
HAMDT 448 Scalise, Steve Amendment requires the Administration to receive approval from Congress before implementing a carbon tax. Agreed to Aug 2, 2013
HAMDT 457 Webster, Daniel Amendment prevents federal agencies from implementing significant policy changes without appropriate congress… Agreed to Aug 1, 2013
HAMDT 456 Amendment reduces the cost threshhold from $100 million to $50 million for the requirement that all regulatio… Agreed to Aug 1, 2013
HAMDT 452 Sessions, Pete Amendment requires an agency submitting a report on any proposed Federal rule to include an assessment, as pa… Agreed to Aug 1, 2013
HAMDT 449 Amendment adds to the definition of what constitutes a "major rule" to include any interim final rule issued … Agreed to Aug 1, 2013
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013 - (Sec. 2) States that the purposes of this Act are to: (1) increase accountability for and transparency in the federal regulatory process by requiring Congress to approve all new major regulations, and (2) include in the definition of "major rule" any rule that implements or provides for the imposition or collection of a tax on carbon emissions. Defines "carbon tax" as a fee, levy, or price on: (1) emissions, including carbon dioxide emissions generated by the burning of coal, natural gas, or oil; or (2) coal, natural gas, or oil based on emissions, including carbon dioxide emissions, that would be generated through the fuel's combustion.

(Sec. 3) Revises provisions relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking to require a federal agency promulgating a rule to include in its report to Congress and to the Comptroller General (GAO): (1) a classification of the rule as a major or nonmajor rule; (2) a list of other regulatory actions taken by the agency or by any other federal agency that are intended to implement the same statutory provision or regulatory objective, as well as the individual and aggregate economic effects of those actions; and (3) a complete copy of any cost-benefit analysis of a rule, including an analysis of jobs added or lost, differentiating between public and private sector jobs.

Requires a joint resolution of approval of major rules to be enacted before such rules may take effect (currently, major rules take effect unless a joint resolution disapproving them is enacted). Provides that if a joint resolution of approval is not enacted by the end of 70 session days or legislative days, as applicable, after the agency proposing the rule submits its report on such rule to Congress, the major rule shall be deemed not to be approved and shall not take effect. Permits a major rule to take effect for one 90-calendar day period without such approval if the President determines it is necessary because of an imminent threat to health or safety or other emergency, for the enforcement of criminal laws, for national security, or to implement an international trade agreement.

Sets forth the congressional approval procedure for major rules and the congressional disapproval procedure for nonmajor rules. Prohibits an agency from allowing a major rule to take effect without the congressional review procedures set forth in this Act.

Requires the introduction of a joint resolution addressing a report classifying a rule as a major rule within three legislative days in the House of Representative and three session days in the Senate. Prohibits any amendments to such a joint resolution at any stage of the legislative process. Provides for expedited consideration of a joint resolution of approval and requires a vote on such resolution in the Senate within 15 session days after it is reported by the committee to which it was referred, or after such committee has been discharged from further consideration of the resolution.

Revises the definition of "major rule" to mean any rule that: (1) has resulted in or is likely to result in an annual effect on the economy of $50 million or more (currently, $100 million); (2) is made by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and that would have a significant impact on a substantial number of agricultural entities; (3) implements or provides for the imposition or collection of a carbon tax; or (4) is made under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Allows a court to review whether an agency has completed the necessary requirements under this Act for a rule to take effect (currently, no judicial review of a determination, finding, action, or omission in the rulemaking process is subject to judicial review). Limits the effect of a joint resolution of approval of a major rule.

Makes this Act inapplicable to rules that concern monetary policy proposed or implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Open Market Committee.

Provides that any rule promulgated by a federal agency that relates to a regulatory program for a commercial, recreational, or subsistence activity related to hunting, fishing, or camping, or any rule other than a major rule for which an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, shall take effect at such time as the agency determines.

(Sec. 4) Amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to provide that any congressional approval procedure set forth in this Act affecting budget authority, outlays, or receipts shall be assumed to be effective unless it is not approved in accordance with this Act.

(Sec. 5) Directs the Comptroller General to conduct a study to determine as of the date of enactment of this Act: (1) how many rules were in effect, (2) how many major rules were in effect, and (3) the total estimated economic cost imposed by all such rules. Requires a report to Congress on such study within one year of the enactment of this Act.

What's happening now September 9, 2013

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

 Related & companion bills 5
 Bill text 4 versions

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 5
 Cosponsors 127
R
Smith, Jason
Missouri · Jul 19, 2013
R
Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck"
Tennessee · Jul 8, 2013
Nunes, Devin
· Jun 24, 2013
BRADY, KEVIN
· Jun 12, 2013
Duffy, Sean
· Jun 6, 2013
Herrera Beutler, Jaime
· Jun 6, 2013
TERRY, LEE
· Jun 5, 2013
R
Scott, Austin
Georgia · Jun 4, 2013
Marchant, Kenny
· May 16, 2013
R
Daines, Steve
Montana · May 15, 2013
R
Weber, Randy K. Sr.
Texas · May 7, 2013
Rice, Tom
· Apr 16, 2013
Bridenstine, Jim
· Apr 11, 2013
COBLE, HOWARD
· Apr 11, 2013
Ryan, Paul
· Mar 25, 2013
R
Lankford, James
Oklahoma · Mar 14, 2013
Farenthold, Blake
· Mar 5, 2013
Pittenger, Robert
· Feb 25, 2013
R
McCaul, Michael T.
Texas · Feb 15, 2013
R
Diaz-Balart, Mario
Florida · Feb 12, 2013
Walorski, Jackie
· Feb 12, 2013
Graves, Tom
· Feb 8, 2013
KINGSTON, JACK
· Feb 8, 2013
Rothfus, Keith
· Feb 8, 2013
Paulsen, Erik
· Feb 5, 2013
R
Wittman, Robert J.
Virginia · Feb 5, 2013
CULBERSON, JOHN
· Feb 4, 2013
R
Cotton, Tom
Arkansas · Jan 29, 2013
Meadows, Mark
· Jan 29, 2013
Granger, Kay
· Jan 25, 2013
Hensarling, Jeb
· Jan 25, 2013
R
McClintock, Tom
California · Jan 25, 2013
McHenry, Patrick
· Jan 25, 2013
MICA, JOHN
· Jan 25, 2013
Murphy, Tim
· Jan 25, 2013
R
Aderholt, Robert B.
Alabama · Jan 23, 2013
Alexander, Rodney
· Jan 23, 2013
R
Amodei, Mark E.
Nevada · Jan 23, 2013
BACHUS, SPENCER
· Jan 23, 2013
Barletta, Lou
· Jan 23, 2013
R
Barr, Andy
Kentucky · Jan 23, 2013
BARTON, JOE
· Jan 23, 2013
Bishop, Rob
· Jan 23, 2013
Black, Diane
· Jan 23, 2013
R
Blackburn, Marsha
Tennessee · Jan 23, 2013
Bonner, Jo
· Jan 23, 2013
Boustany, Charles
· Jan 23, 2013
Brooks, Susan
· Jan 23, 2013
Brooks, Mo
· Jan 23, 2013
R
Calvert, Ken
California · Jan 23, 2013
Page 1 of 3 Next
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H.R. 367: Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013. 113th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/113-HR-367/
MLA
"H.R. 367: Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013." 113th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/113-HR-367/.
Bluebook (legal)
H.R. 367, 113th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/113-HR-367/.
Markdown link
[H.R. 367: Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013](https://openamerica.io/bill/113-HR-367/)
Report a problem