Skip to main content
HR 2495 113th Congress House Energy Advanced technology and technological innovations Computers and information technology Congressional oversight Department of Energy Energy efficiency and conservation Energy research Public-private cooperation Research administration and funding Research and development

American Super Computing Leadership Act

Introduced: June 25, 2013 See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 10 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Sep 9, 2014
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Sep 8, 2014
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Sep 8, 2014
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7260-7261)
Sep 8, 2014
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7260-7261)
Sep 8, 2014
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2495.
Sep 8, 2014
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7260-7263)
Sep 8, 2014
Mr. Smith (TX) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Sep 24, 2013
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
Jun 25, 2013
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Jun 25, 2013
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

American Super Computing Leadership Act - (Sec. 3) Amends the Department of Energy High-End Computing Revitalization Act of 2004 with respect to: (1) exascale computing (computing system performance at or near 10 to the 18th power floating point operations per second), and (2) a high-end computing system with performance substantially exceeding that of systems commonly available for advanced scientific and engineering applications.

Directs the Secretary of Energy (DOE) to: (1) coordinate the development of high-end computing systems across DOE; (2) partner with universities, National Laboratories, and industry to ensure the broadest possible application of the technology developed in the program to other challenges in science, engineering, medicine, and industry; and (3) include among the multiple architectures researched, at DOE discretion, any computer technologies that show promise of substantial reductions in power requirements and substantial gains in parallelism of multicore processors, concurrency, memory and storage, bandwidth, and reliability.

Repeals authority for establishment of at least one High-End Software Development Center.

Directs the Secretary to conduct a coordinated research program to develop exascale computing systems to advance DOE missions. Requires establishment through competitive merit review of two or more DOE National Laboratory-industry-university partnerships to conduct integrated research, development, and engineering of multiple exascale architectures.

Requires the Secretary to conduct mission-related co-design activities in developing such exascale platforms. Defines "co-design" as the joint development of application algorithms, models, and codes with computer technology architectures and operating systems to maximize effective use of high-end computing systems.

Directs the Secretary to develop any advancements in hardware and software technology required to realize fully the potential of an exascale production system in addressing DOE target applications and solving scientific problems involving predictive modeling and simulation and large-scale data analytics and management. Requires DOE also to explore the use of exascale computing technologies to advance a broad range of science and engineering.

Directs the Secretary to submit to Congress an integrated strategy and program management plan.

Requires the Secretary, before initiating construction or installation of an exascale-class computing facility, to transmit to Congress a separate plan detailing: (1) the proposed facility's cost projections and capabilities to significantly accelerate the development of new energy technologies; (2) technical risks and challenges that must be overcome to achieve successful completion and operation of the facility; and (3) an independent assessment of the scientific and technological advances expected from such a facility relative to those expected from a comparable investment in expanded research and applications at terascale-class and petascale-class computing facilities, including an evaluation of where investments should be made in the system software and algorithms to enable these advances.

What's happening now September 9, 2014

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

 Committees of jurisdiction 3