Skip to main content
HRES 563 112th Congress House Congress House of Representatives Legislative rules and procedure

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2117) to prohibit the Department of Education from overreaching into academic affairs and program eligibility under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965.

Introduced: February 27, 2012 Introduced by: Foxx, Virginia Republican · North Carolina See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 10 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Feb 28, 2012
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H976-980)
Feb 28, 2012
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 244 - 171 (Roll no. 74).(text: CR H976-977)
Feb 28, 2012
The previous question was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H980)
Feb 28, 2012
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Feb 28, 2012
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 563.
Feb 28, 2012
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 244 - 171 (Roll no. 74). (text: CR H976-977)
Feb 27, 2012
Introduced in House
Feb 27, 2012
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 114.
Feb 27, 2012
It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the bill.
Feb 27, 2012
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 112-404, by Ms. Foxx.
 Votes taken on this bill 1
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
Feb 28, 2012 House · vote #74 On Agreeing to the Resolution Passed 244171 See who voted →
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2117) to prohibit the Department of Education from overreaching into academic affairs and program eligibility under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965.
What's happening now February 28, 2012

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1