Skip to main content
HRES 1413 111th Congress Crime and Law Enforcement

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the holding in Miranda v. Arizona may be interpreted to provide for the admissibility of a terrorist suspect's responses in an interrogation…

Show full title

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the holding in Miranda v. Arizona may be interpreted to provide for the admissibility of a terrorist suspect's responses in an interrogation without administration of the Miranda warnings, to the extent that the interrogation is carried out to acquire information concerning other threats to public safety.

Introduced: May 27, 2010 See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
This resolution expired with the 111th Congress
It was not agreed to before the 111th Congress (2009–2010) adjourned, so it is no longer active. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
  We don't have the full action history for this bill yet. Check back soon.
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Res. 1413: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the holding in Miranda v. Arizona may be interpreted to provide for the admissibility of a terrorist suspect's responses in an interrogation without administration of the Miranda warnings, to the extent that the interrogation is carried out to acquire information concerning other threats to public safety.. 111th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/111-HRES-1413/
MLA
"H. Res. 1413: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the holding in Miranda v. Arizona may be interpreted to provide for the admissibility of a terrorist suspect's responses in an interrogation without administration of the Miranda warnings, to the extent that the interrogation is carried out to acquire information concerning other threats to public safety.." 111th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/111-HRES-1413/.
Bluebook (legal)
H. Res. 1413, 111th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/111-HRES-1413/.
Markdown link
[H. Res. 1413: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the holding in Miranda v. Arizona may be interpreted to provide for the admissibility of a terrorist suspect's responses in an interrogation without administration of the Miranda warnings, to the extent that the interrogation is carried out to acquire information concerning other threats to public safety.](https://openamerica.io/bill/111-HRES-1413/)
Report a problem