Skip to main content
S 186 110th Congress Senate Crime and Law Enforcement Attorney-client privilege Civil actions and liability Criminal investigation Evidence (Law) Federal employees Government Operations and Politics Government attorneys Indictments Law Legal fees

Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007

Introduced: January 4, 2007 See on congress.gov
This bill died when the 110th Congress ended
It never became law before the 110th Congress (2007–2008) adjourned, and bills don't carry over to the next Congress. It would have to be reintroduced. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 4 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Sep 18, 2007
Committee on the Judiciary. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 110-280.
Jan 4, 2007
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S183)
Jan 4, 2007
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S181-183)
Jan 4, 2007
Introduced in Senate
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007 - Amends the federal criminal code to prohibit any U.S. agent or attorney, in any federal investigation or criminal or civil enforcement matter, from demanding, requesting, or conditioning treatment on the disclosure by an organization (or affiliated person) of any communication protected by the attorney-client privilege or any attorney work product.

Prohibits a U.S. agent or attorney from conditioning a civil or criminal charging decision relating to an organization (or affiliated person) on one or more specified actions, or from using one or more such actions as a factor in determining whether an organization or affiliated person is cooperating with the government.

Numbers among the actions a U.S. agent or attorney may not use as a charging decision condition or a cooperation-determining factor: (1) any valid assertion of the attorney-client privilege or privilege for attorney work product; (2) the provision of counsel to, or contribution to the legal defense fees or expenses of, an employee of the organization; (3) entry into a joint-defense, information-sharing, or common-interest agreement with an employee of the organization if the organization determines it has a common interest in defending against the investigation or enforcement matter; (4) the sharing of relevant information with an employee; or (5) a failure to terminate an employee's employment, or otherwise sanction an employee, because of the employee's decision to exercise his or her constitutional rights or other legal protections in response to a government request.

Prohibits a U.S. agent or attorney from demanding or requesting that an organization or an affiliated person not take any such action.

What's happening now September 18, 2007

Committee on the Judiciary. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 110-280.

 Related & companion bills 1
 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). S. 186: Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007. 110th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/110-S-186/
MLA
"S. 186: Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007." 110th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/110-S-186/.
Bluebook (legal)
S. 186, 110th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/110-S-186/.
Markdown link
[S. 186: Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007](https://openamerica.io/bill/110-S-186/)
Report a problem