Skip to main content
S 1690 109th Congress Senate Education Academic performance Administrative procedure Civics education Department of Education Disabled Economic theory Economics and Public Finance Educational accountability Educational tests Elementary and secondary education English language Federal aid to education Federal-state relations Geography and mapping Government Operations and Politics Government paperwork Government publicity Higher education History

No Child Left Behind Flexibility and Improvements Act

Introduced: September 13, 2005 Introduced by: Collins, Susan M. Republican · Maine See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Sep 13, 2005
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Sep 13, 2005
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9986-9988)
Sep 13, 2005
Introduced in Senate
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

No Child Left Behind Flexibility and Improvements Act - Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, to revise requirements relating to annual yearly progress (AYP) of students and schools, statewide and local accountability systems, special education, limited English proficiency students, funding levels and academic assessment deferrals, highly qualified teachers, and reading activities.

Authorizes the Secretary of Education to modify an AYP timeline.

Allows states to use: (1) additional types of statewide models and systems for measuring all students' progress; and (2) alternative assessments, designated by their individualized education program plan teams, for students with disabilities.

Gives states an option to include as limited English proficiency students, until they complete secondary school, those formerly in such subgroup who have subsequently acquired English proficiency.

Permits use of local assessments in measuring AYP.

Increases the levels of ESEA funding which must be reached before states are not allowed certain deferrals of academic assessments.

Revises requirements relating to AYP by group and subgroup.

Adds options for deeming teachers of multiple academic subjects as highly qualified, and for general social studies certification.

Authorizes use of reading activities subgrants for individual or small-group instruction, as well as for class-wide instruction.

What's happening now September 13, 2005

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

 Committees of jurisdiction 1