Skip to main content
HR 6232 109th Congress House Education Academic performance Disabled Distance education Educational accountability Educational tests Elementary and secondary education Elementary education Government Operations and Politics Housing and Community Development Illiteracy Language and languages Law Licenses Mathematics Rating of teachers Reading Rural education School administration Secondary education

Practicality in Education Act

Introduced: September 28, 2006 Introduced by: Moran, Jerry Republican · Kansas See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Nov 2, 2006
Referred to the Subcommittee on Education Reform.
Sep 28, 2006
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Sep 28, 2006
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Practicality in Education Act - Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow states to exclude the results of limited English proficient students, during their first two school years in this country, from adequate yearly progress (AYP) assessments, when such students are assessed in reading or mathematics in a language other than their native tongue.

Requires that state determinations of AYP pursuant to state academic achievement standards employ a growth model, measuring the achievement of the same students and subgroups from year to year.

Requires that 4% of disabled students taking modified assessments be counted in measuring student proficiency pursuant to such standards.

Gives schools which are identified as needing improvement, due to having failed for two consecutive years to make AYP pursuant to such standards, a full new school year to meet the standards before its students must be given the option to transfer to another public school. (Currently, such transfers must be allowed at the beginning of the school year following such identification.)

Provides that, in determining AYP, a student in more than one group subject to measurable annual objectives shall be counted only toward one such group.

Allows states to consider new middle and secondary school special education and rural teachers to be highly qualified even if they do not pass a rigorous state academic subject test in every subject they teach, provided they pass such a test for one subject they teach and, with respect to each other subject they teach, work in close consultation with another teacher who is highly qualified in such other subject.

What's happening now November 2, 2006

Referred to the Subcommittee on Education Reform.

 Committees of jurisdiction 2