Skip to main content
HR 420 109th Congress House Law Civil actions and liability Civil procedure Commerce Court records District courts Evidence (Law) Frivolous lawsuits Government Operations and Politics Interstate commerce Jurisdiction Lawyers Legal ethics Legal fees Residence requirements State courts Torts

Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 2005

Introduced: January 26, 2005 See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 29 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Oct 31, 2005
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Oct 27, 2005
Rule H. Res. 508 passed House.
Oct 27, 2005
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 508. (consideration: CR H9312-9329)
Oct 27, 2005
Mr. Barrow moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.
Oct 27, 2005
The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text: CR H9319)
Oct 27, 2005
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H9327)
Oct 27, 2005
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 420.
Oct 27, 2005
DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 508, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 40 minutes of debate on the Schiff amendment in the nature of a substitute.
Oct 27, 2005
DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 508, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Smith (TX) amendment.
Oct 27, 2005
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 420.
Oct 27, 2005
The Speaker designated the Honorable Tom Latham to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Oct 27, 2005
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 508 and Rule XVIII.
Oct 27, 2005
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 420 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
Oct 27, 2005
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 228 - 184 (Roll no. 553).
Oct 27, 2005
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Oct 27, 2005
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 228 - 184 (Roll no. 553).
Oct 27, 2005
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 196 - 217 (Roll no. 552). (consideration: CR H9327-9329; text: CR H9327)
Oct 27, 2005
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
Oct 27, 2005
Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Barrow motion to recommit.
Oct 25, 2005
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 508 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 420 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
Jun 14, 2005
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 69.
Jun 14, 2005
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 109-123.
May 25, 2005
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 11.
May 25, 2005
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
May 20, 2005
Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property Discharged.
Mar 2, 2005
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.
Feb 16, 2005
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H633-634)
Jan 26, 2005
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 26, 2005
Introduced in House
 Votes taken on this bill 2
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
Oct 27, 2005 House · vote #553 On Passage Passed 228184 See who voted →
Oct 27, 2005 House · vote #552 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions Failed 196217 See who voted →
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 2005 - (Sec. 2) Amends Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Signing of Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to Court; Sanctions) to: (1) require courts to impose sanctions on attorneys, law firms, or parties who file frivolous lawsuits (currently discretionary); (2) disallow the withdrawal or correction of pleadings to avoid Rule 11 sanctions; (3) require courts to award parties prevailing on Rule 11 motions reasonable expenses and attorney's fees, if warranted; and (4) authorize courts to impose Rule 11 sanctions that include reimbursement of a party's reasonable litigation costs in connection with frivolous lawsuits.

(Sec. 3) Makes Rule 11 applicable to state civil actions where the state court determines, upon motion, that an action substantially affects interstate commerce.

(Sec. 4) Requires personal injury claims (defined to exclude class actions) filed in state or federal court to be filed in the county or federal district in which: (1) the person bringing the claim resides at the time of filing or resided at the time of the alleged injury; (2) the alleged injury or circumstances giving rise to the claim occurred; (3) the defendant's principal place of business is located; or (4) the defendant resides, if the defendant is an individual. Directs the trial court to determine which county or federal district is the most appropriate forum in those situations where the alleged injury occurred in more than one county or district.

(Sec. 6) Requires a federal district court to suspend from the practice of law for one year (or for an additional period at the court's discretion) an attorney who is found to have violated Rule 11 three or more times. Grants such attorney a right to appeal a suspension and permits reinstatement after suspension under procedures and conditions prescribed by the court.

(Sec. 7) Establishes a rebuttable presumption that an attempt to litigate, in any forum, an issue that has been previously litigated and lost on three consecutive prior occasions is a Rule 11 violation.

(Sec. 8) Imposes additional sanctions for the intentional destruction of documents sought in, and highly relevant to, a court proceeding.

What's happening now October 31, 2005

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

 Committees of jurisdiction 3