Skip to main content
HR 4571 108th Congress House Law Appellate procedure Civil actions and liability Civil procedure Commerce District courts Frivolous lawsuits Government Operations and Politics Injunctions Interstate commerce Jurisdiction Lawyers Legal ethics Legal fees Obstruction of justice Residence requirements State courts Torts

Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 2004

Introduced: June 15, 2004 See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 22 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Sep 15, 2004
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sep 14, 2004
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Sep 14, 2004
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 174 (Roll no. 450).
Sep 14, 2004
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 174 (Roll no. 450).
Sep 14, 2004
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 196 - 211 (Roll no. 449). (text: CR H7118)
Sep 14, 2004
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H7119)
Sep 14, 2004
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the DeLauro motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to have the bill reported back to the House with an amendment that adds a new section stating that the provisions of the bill are not applicable to Benedict Arnold Corporations.
Sep 14, 2004
Ms. DeLauro moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary. (consideration: CR H7118-7120; text: CR H7118)
Sep 14, 2004
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 766, the House proceeded with 40 minutes of debate on the Turner (TX) amendment in the nature of a substitute.
Sep 14, 2004
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 4571.
Sep 14, 2004
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4571 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Juciciary now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.
Sep 14, 2004
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 766. (consideration: CR H7098-7120; text of measure as reported in House: CR H7098-7099)
Sep 14, 2004
Rule H. Res. 766 passed House.
Sep 13, 2004
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 766 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4571 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Juciciary now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.
Sep 13, 2004
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 421.
Sep 13, 2004
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 108-682.
Sep 8, 2004
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 10.
Sep 8, 2004
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Sep 3, 2004
Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property Discharged.
Jun 28, 2004
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.
Jun 15, 2004
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jun 15, 2004
Introduced in House
 Votes taken on this bill 2
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
Sep 14, 2004 House · vote #450 On Passage Passed 229174 See who voted →
Sep 14, 2004 House · vote #449 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions Failed 196211 See who voted →
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on September 13, 2004. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 2004 - (Sec. 2) Amends Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to: (1) require courts to impose sanctions on attorneys, law firms, or parties who file frivolous lawsuits (currently, discretionary); (2) disallow the withdrawal or correction of pleadings to avoid Rule 11 sanctions; (3) require courts to award parties prevailing on Rule 11 motions reasonable expenses and attorney's fees, if warranted; (4) authorize courts to impose Rule 11 sanctions that include reimbursement of a party's reasonable litigation costs in connection with frivolous lawsuits; and (5) make the discovery phase of litigation subject to Rule 11 sanctions.

(Sec. 3) Makes Rule 11 applicable to State civil actions where the court determines, upon motion, that the action affects interstate commerce.

(Sec. 4) Requires personal injury claims (defined to exclude class actions) filed in State or Federal court to be filed in the county or Federal district in which: (1) the person bringing the claim resides at the time of filing or resided at the time of the alleged injury; (2) the alleged injury or circumstances giving rise to the injury occurred; or (3) the defendant's principal place of business is located. Directs the trial court to determine which county or Federal district is the most appropriate forum in those situations where the alleged injury occurred in more than one county or district.

(Sec. 6) Requires a mandatory one-year suspension for attorneys determined by a Federal district court to have violated Rule 11 three or more times in that court during the attorney's career. Authorizes the court to suspend such attorneys for an additional period as the court considers appropriate. Gives suspended attorneys the right to appeal and stays suspensions pending appeal. Requires suspended attorneys to petition the court for reinstatement under procedures and conditions prescribed by the court.

(Sec. 7) Imposes civil sanctions commensurate with those sanctions available under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in addition to other available civil sanctions, for willfully and intentionally influencing, obstructing, or impeding a pending court proceeding (or attempting to do the same) through the willful and intentional destruction of documents sought in and highly relevant to that proceeding. Makes such sanctions applicable to both Federal and State court proceedings.

What's happening now September 15, 2004

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

 Committees of jurisdiction 3