Skip to main content
HR 3574 108th Congress House Taxation Accounting Commerce Corporation reports Corporation taxes Economic growth Economic impact statements Employee ownership Employee stock options Executive compensation Finance and Financial Sector Financial statements Foreign Trade and International Finance Government Operations and Politics Government paperwork Governmental investigations Income tax Industrial research Information disclosure (Securities law) International competitiveness

Stock Option Accounting Reform Act

Introduced: November 21, 2003 See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 37 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Sep 7, 2004
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Jul 21, 2004
Received in the Senate.
Jul 20, 2004
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 3574.
Jul 20, 2004
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Jul 20, 2004
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 312 - 111 (Roll no. 397).
Jul 20, 2004
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 312 - 111 (Roll no. 397).
Jul 20, 2004
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Jul 20, 2004
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Jul 20, 2004
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3574.
Jul 20, 2004
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kanjorski amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Kanjorski demanded a recorded vote and made a point of no quorum. The Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day and the point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
Jul 20, 2004
DEBATE - Pursuant to House Resolution 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with twenty minutes of debate on the Kanjorski amendment in the nature of a substitute.
Jul 20, 2004
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Maloney amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Maloney demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
Jul 20, 2004
DEBATE - Pursuant to House Resolution 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Maloney amendment.
Jul 20, 2004
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Sherman amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Sherman demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
Jul 20, 2004
DEBATE - Pursuant to House Resoultion 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Sherman amendment.
Jul 20, 2004
DEBATE - Pursuant to House Resolution 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Oxley amendment.
Jul 20, 2004
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3574.
Jul 20, 2004
The Speaker designated the Honorable Tom Latham to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Jul 20, 2004
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 725 and Rule XVIII.
Jul 20, 2004
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3574 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
Jul 20, 2004
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 725. (consideration: CR H6001-6022; text of measure as reported in House: CR H6011-6012)
Jul 20, 2004
Rule H. Res. 725 passed House.
Jul 19, 2004
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 725 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3574 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
Jul 16, 2004
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 367.
Jul 16, 2004
Committee on Energy and Commerce discharged.
Jul 15, 2004
Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce for a period ending not later than July 16, 2004 for consideration of such provisions of the bill and amendment as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(f), rule X.
Jul 15, 2004
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 108-609, Part I.
Jun 25, 2004
Mr. Boehlert asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Financial Services have until midnight on July 2 to file a report on H.R. 3574. Agreed to without objection.
Jun 15, 2004
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 13.
Jun 15, 2004
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Jun 3, 2004
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
May 12, 2004
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
May 12, 2004
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Mar 3, 2004
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Dec 2, 2003
Referred to the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises.
Nov 21, 2003
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Nov 21, 2003
Introduced in House
 Votes taken on this bill 1
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
Jul 20, 2004 House · vote #397 On Passage Passed 312111 See who voted →
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on July 15, 2004. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Stock Option Accounting Reform Act - (Sec. 2) Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require an issuer of registered securities to show as an expense in its annual report the fair value of all stock purchase options granted after December 31, 2004, to: (1) all individuals serving as the chief executive officer of an issuer, or acting in a similar capacity, during the most recent fiscal year, regardless of compensation level; and (2) the four most highly compensated executive officers (other than a chief executive officer) that were serving as executive officers of an issuer at the end of the most recent fiscal year ("named executive officer").

Defines the fair value of an option to purchase such stock.

Exempts small business issuers from the Act's requirement.

(Sec. 3) Amends the Securities Act of 1933 to prohibit the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from recognizing as "generally accepted" any accounting principle relating to the expensing of stock options unless it complies with both: (1) specified expense recomputation requirements; and (2) a required joint study by the Secretaries of Commerce and of Labor of the economic impact of the mandatory expensing of employee stock options.

Requires the recomputation and re-reporting of the expense of a stock purchase option that is exercised, to equal the difference between the price of the underlying stock and the exercise price.

Requires the re-reporting as a reduction of the total expense originally required to be reported if the option expires or is forfeited.

(Sec. 4) Directs the SEC to require each issuer to include in its periodic report more detailed information regarding stock option plans, stock purchase plans, and other arrangements involving an employee acquisition of an equity interest in the company, including: (1) a discussion, written in accordance with the Plain English Handbook published by the SEC Office of Investor Education and Assistance on the dilutive effect of stock option plans; (2) expanded disclosure of the dilutive effect of employee stock options on the issuer's earnings per share; (3) prominent placement and increased comparability and uniformity of all stock option related information; (4) the number of outstanding stock options; (5) the weighted average exercise price of all outstanding stock options; and (6) the estimated number of stock options outstanding that will vest in each year.

What's happening now September 7, 2004

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

 Committees of jurisdiction 4