Skip to main content
HR 1689 106th Congress House

To prohibit States from imposing restrictions on the operation of motor vehicles providing limousine service between a place in a State and a place in another State, and for other purposes.

Introduced: September 30, 1999 See on congress.gov
Transportation and Public Works CommerceFederal preemptionGovernment Operations and PoliticsInterstate commerce
More subjectsShow fewer subjects
Interstate relationsLawLicensesLocal lawsState lawsTaxicabsUrban affairsUrban transportation
This bill died when the 106th Congress ended
It never became law before the 106th Congress (1999–2000) adjourned, and bills don't carry over to the next Congress. It would have to be reintroduced. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 21 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Dec 7, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 15, 2000.
Dec 5, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 7, 2000.
Nov 14, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 5, 2000.
Nov 4, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 14, 2000.
Nov 3, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 4, 2000.
Nov 2, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 3, 2000.
Nov 1, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 2, 2000.
Oct 31, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 1, 2000.
Oct 30, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 31, 2000.
Oct 29, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 30, 2000.
Oct 28, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 29, 2000.
Oct 27, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 28, 2000.
Oct 26, 2000
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 27, 2000.
Oct 25, 2000
Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure for a period ending not later than Oct. 26, 2000 for consideration of such provisions of the bill and amendment as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(q), rule X.
Oct 25, 2000
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 106-1003, Part I.
Sep 14, 2000
Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade, and Consumer Protection Discharged.
Sep 14, 2000
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Sep 14, 2000
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
May 25, 1999
Referred to the Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade, and Consumer Protection.
May 5, 1999
Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.
May 5, 1999
Introduced in House
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Latest action December 7, 2000

House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 15, 2000.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service
Makes it unlawful for a State, State political subdivision or agency, interstate agency, or political agency of two or more States to restrict interstate commerce by enforcing any regulation or law that restricts the operation of a motor vehicle providing pre-arranged ground transportation service (limousine service) if the motor carrier providing such service: (1) is registered under specified Federal law for the interstate transportation of passengers; (2) meets all applicable requirements of the State or States in which the motor carrier is domiciled or registered to do business; and (3) was hired pursuant to a contract for travel from one State (including intermediate stops) to a destination in another State, or travel from one State (including one or more intermediate stops in another State) to a destination in the original State.

Provides that nothing in this Act shall be construed as subjecting taxicab service to Federal regulation pursuant to the Secretary of Transportation's authority over interstate commerce.

 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 3
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H.R. 1689: To prohibit States from imposing restrictions on the operation of motor vehicles providing limousine service between a place in a State and a place in another State, and for other purposes.. 106th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/106-HR-1689/
MLA
"H.R. 1689: To prohibit States from imposing restrictions on the operation of motor vehicles providing limousine service between a place in a State and a place in another State, and for other purposes.." 106th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/106-HR-1689/.
Bluebook (legal)
H.R. 1689, 106th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/106-HR-1689/.
Markdown link
[H.R. 1689: To prohibit States from imposing restrictions on the operation of motor vehicles providing limousine service between a place in a State and a place in another State, and for other purposes.](https://openamerica.io/bill/106-HR-1689/)
Report a problem