Skip to main content
HCONRES 34 106th Congress House

Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be parity between the compensation of members of the uniformed services and the compensation of civilian employees of the United States.

Introduced: March 10, 1999 Introduced by: Hoyer, Steny H. Democratic · Maryland See on congress.gov
Armed Forces and National Security Federal employeesGovernment Operations and PoliticsMilitary paySalaries
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
This resolution expired with the 106th Congress
It was not agreed to before the 106th Congress (1999–2000) adjourned, so it is no longer active. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 4 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
Feb 23, 1999
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.
Feb 17, 1999
Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil Service.
Feb 12, 1999
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 1999
Introduced in House
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Latest action February 23, 1999

Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Expresses the sense of the Congress that there should be parity between the compensation of members of the armed forces and Federal civilian employees.

 Bill text 1 version

Source documents hosted by congress.gov.

 Committees of jurisdiction 4
 Cosponsors 9
All 9 Democratic 6
D
Davis, Danny K.
Illinois · Jul 13, 1999
QUINN, JACK
· Jun 7, 1999
LUCAS, KEN
· May 24, 1999
 D
Smith, Adam
Washington · May 13, 1999
 D
McGovern, James P.
Massachusetts · Mar 10, 1999
 D
Pelosi, Nancy
California · Mar 4, 1999
 D
DeLauro, Rosa L.
Connecticut · Mar 2, 1999
FROST, MARTIN
· Feb 25, 1999
 D
Norton, Eleanor Holmes
District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1999
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Con. Res. 34: Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be parity between the compensation of members of the uniformed services and the compensation of civilian employees of the United States.. 106th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/106-HCONRES-34/
MLA
"H. Con. Res. 34: Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be parity between the compensation of members of the uniformed services and the compensation of civilian employees of the United States.." 106th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/106-HCONRES-34/.
Bluebook (legal)
H. Con. Res. 34, 106th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/106-HCONRES-34/.
Markdown link
[H. Con. Res. 34: Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be parity between the compensation of members of the uniformed services and the compensation of civilian employees of the United States.](https://openamerica.io/bill/106-HCONRES-34/)
Report a problem