State Reciprocity in Professional Boxing Act of 1997
Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.
State Reciprocity in Professional Boxing Act of 1997 - Amends the Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996 to define a "malicious foul or infraction": (1) as any violent act or series of violent acts in which a professional boxer intentionally causes, or attempts to cause, bodily injury to an opposing boxer during the course of a professional boxing match in a manner inconsistent with the generally accepted methods of competition in a boxing match, as determined by guidelines set forth by the Association of State Boxing Commissions; and (2) to include headbutting, kicking, striking an opponent after a round has ended, biting an opponent's body or extremities, and striking an opponent on an impermissible part of the opponent's body.
Includes among the purposes of such Act to ensure that no boxer is permitted to fight in any State while under suspension by any State boxing commission.
Requires each boxing commission to establish procedures to ensure that no boxer is permitted to box while under suspension for the commission of a malicious foul or infraction.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections.
- Introduced in House Formatted Text PDF
Cite this page
U.S. Congress. (2026). H.R. 2354: State Reciprocity in Professional Boxing Act of 1997. 105th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/105-HR-2354/
"H.R. 2354: State Reciprocity in Professional Boxing Act of 1997." 105th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/105-HR-2354/.
H.R. 2354, 105th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/105-HR-2354/.
[H.R. 2354: State Reciprocity in Professional Boxing Act of 1997](https://openamerica.io/bill/105-HR-2354/)