Federal Agency Compliance Act
| Date | Chamber | What was voted on | Result | Yes–No | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1998 | House · vote #24 | On Passage | Passed | 241–176 | See who voted → |
Amendments propose changes to this bill. Members vote on amendments separately before the final bill vote. An agreed amendment becomes part of the bill; a failed amendment does not.
1 agreed to 3 failed 1 pending / other
| Amendment | Sponsor | Status |
|---|---|---|
| HAMDT 499 | — | Agreed to |
| HAMDT 496 | — | Failed |
| HAMDT 495 | — | Failed |
| HAMDT 494 | Nadler, Jerrold | Failed |
| HAMDT 493 | — | Withdrawn |
Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.
Federal Agency Compliance Act - Requires a Federal agency and its officers and employees, in administering a statute, rule, regulation, program, or policy (statute) within a judicial circuit, to adhere to the existing precedent respecting the interpretation and application of such statute, as established by the decisions of the U.S. court of appeals for that circuit, with exceptions.
Allows an agency to take a position, either in administration or litigation, that is at variance with such precedent if: (1) it is uncertain whether the administration of the statute will be subject to review by the appeals court that established that precedent or a court of appeals for another circuit; (2) the Government did not seek further review of the case in which that precedent was first established in that appeals court or the U.S. Supreme Court because neither the United States nor any agency or officer thereof was a party to the case or because the decision establishing that precedent was otherwise substantially favorable to the Government; or (3) it is reasonable to question the continued validity of that precedent in light of a subsequent decision of that appeals court or the U.S. Supreme Court, a subsequent change in any pertinent statute or regulation, or any other subsequent change in the public policy or circumstances on which that precedent was based.
Requires: (1) the officers of any Federal agency supervising the conduct of litigation to ensure that the initiation, defense, and continuation of proceedings in the U.S. courts within, or subject to the jurisdiction of, a particular judicial circuit avoids unnecessarily repetitive litigation on questions of law already consistently resolved against the U.S. position in precedents established by the U.S. courts of appeals for three or more other judicial circuits; (2) decisions on whether to initiate, defend, or continue litigation for purposes of this Act to take into account specified factors, including the effect of intervening changes in pertinent law or the public policy or circumstances on which the established precedents were based; and (3) the Attorney General to report annually to specified congressional committees on the Federal agency efforts to comply with such requirements. Specifies that a decision on whether to initiate, defend, or continue litigation is not subject to court review on the grounds that the decision violates such requirements.
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
- Engrossed in House Formatted Text PDF
- Introduced in House Formatted Text PDF
- Referred in Senate Formatted Text PDF
- Reported in House Formatted Text PDF
Cite this page
U.S. Congress. (2026). H.R. 1544: Federal Agency Compliance Act. 105th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/105-HR-1544/
"H.R. 1544: Federal Agency Compliance Act." 105th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/105-HR-1544/.
H.R. 1544, 105th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/105-HR-1544/.
[H.R. 1544: Federal Agency Compliance Act](https://openamerica.io/bill/105-HR-1544/)