Skip to main content
HR 2 104th Congress House Economics and Public Finance Appellate procedure Appropriations Budget deficits Congress Congressional oversight Congressional reporting requirements Congressional veto District courts Economic impact statements Executive impoundment of appropriated funds Expedited congressional procedure Federal budgets Government Operations and Politics Government spending reductions House rules and procedure Income tax Injunctions Item veto Judicial review

Line Item Veto Act

Introduced: January 4, 1995 See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 50 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Feb 7, 1995
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred jointly to the Committees on Budget; Governmental Affairs pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, with instructions that if one Committee reports, the other Committee have thirty days to report or be discharged.
Feb 6, 1995
PROCEEDINGS POSTPONED - The Chair put the question on agreeing to the Waters amendment and anounced that, by voice vote, the amendment was not agreed to. Ms. Waters demanded a recorded vote and, pursuant to the preceeding unanimous consent agreement, further proceedings were postponed.
Feb 6, 1995
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Feb 6, 1995
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 294 - 134 (Roll no. 95).
Feb 6, 1995
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 294 - 134 (Roll no. 95).
Feb 6, 1995
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 185 - 241 (Roll no. 94). (consideration: CR H1264)
Feb 6, 1995
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
Feb 6, 1995
DEBATE - House proceeded with ten minutes of debate motion to recomit the bill to committee, with instructions.
Feb 6, 1995
Mrs. Collins (IL) moved to recommit with instructions to Government Reform.
Feb 6, 1995
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the House proceeded with ten minutes of further debate, equally divided between Ms. Collins (IL) and Mr. Clinger.
Feb 6, 1995
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Feb 6, 1995
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Feb 6, 1995
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2.
Feb 6, 1995
Pursuant to a previous unanimous consent agreement, the Chair announced the order of business to be the further considera tion of amendments on which action had been postponed.
Feb 6, 1995
PROCEEDINGS POSTPONED - The Chair put the question on agreeing to the Stenholm amendment and anounced that, by voice vote, the amendment was not agreed to. Mr. Stenholm demanded a recorded vote and, pursuant to the preceeding unanimous consent agreement, the vote was postponed.
Feb 6, 1995
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Stenholm amendment.
Feb 6, 1995
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Traficant amendment.
Feb 6, 1995
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Tauzin amendment.
Feb 6, 1995
PROCEEDINGS POSTPONED - The Chair put the question on agreeing to the Orton amendment and anounced that, by voice vote, the amendment was not agreed to. Mr. Orton demanded a recorded vote and, pursuant to the preceeding unanimous consent agreement, further proceedings were postponed.
Feb 6, 1995
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Orton amendment.
Feb 6, 1995
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Pursuant to the unanimous consent agreement of Friday, February 3, 1995, only the following amendments shall be in order for consideration, if offered, in the order and manner specified: 1. Mr. Orton (1 hour of debate), 2. Ms. Waters (30 minutes), 3. Mr. Tauzin (30 minutes), 4. Mr. Traficant (30 minutes), Ms. Slaughter (1 hour), 5. Mr. Stenholm (1 hour). No amendment to the proposed amendments shall be in order. Recorded votes on said amendments, if ordered, shall be postponed until after 5 p.m. today.
Feb 6, 1995
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Feb 6, 1995
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Waters amendment.
Feb 6, 1995
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1225-1264)
Feb 3, 1995
Mr. Armey asked unanimous consent That during further consideration of H.R. 2 pursuant to House Resolution 55 the chairman of the Committee of the Whole may postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment, and that the chairman of the Committee of the Whole may reduce to not less than five minutes the time for voting by electronic device on any postponed question that immediately follows another vote by electronic device on the first in any series of questions shall be not less than 15 minutes. Agreed to without objection.
Feb 3, 1995
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Armey asked unanimous consent that when the Committee of the Whole House meets under the five-minute rule on Monday, Feb. 6, 1995, only the following amendments, if offered, will be considered: an amendment offered by Mr. Orton, debatable for one hour; an amendment offered by Ms. Waters, debatable for 30 minutes; an amendment offered by Mr. Tauzin, debatable for 30 minutes; an amendment offered by Mr. Traficant, debatable for 30 minutes; an amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Ms. Slaughter, debatable for one hour; and an amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Mr. Stenholm, debatable for one hour. No amendment to any of the specified amendments shall be in order. All specified debate time will be equally divided and controlled. The Stenholm amendment will not be offered prior to 5 p.m. and all further recorded votes on amendments, if ordered will be postponed until at least
Feb 3, 1995
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2 as unfinished business.
Feb 3, 1995
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Feb 3, 1995
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1168-1191)
Feb 2, 1995
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2 as unfinished business.
Feb 2, 1995
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Feb 2, 1995
Mr. Clinger moved that the Committee rise.
Feb 2, 1995
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with two hours of general debate.
Feb 2, 1995
The Speaker designated the Honorable John A. Boehner to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Feb 2, 1995
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 55 and Rule XXIII.
Feb 2, 1995
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Providing for consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight and the Committee on Rules, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The amendment shall be considered read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recogition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the Congress...
Feb 2, 1995
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 55. (consideration: CR H1086-1142)
Feb 2, 1995
Rule H. Res. 55 passed House.
Feb 1, 1995
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 55 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Providing for consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight and the Committee on Rules, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The amendment shall be considered read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recogition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the Congress...
Jan 31, 1995
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H902)
Jan 30, 1995
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 5.
Jan 30, 1995
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Government Reform. H. Rept. 104-11, Part II.
Jan 27, 1995
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Rules. H. Rept. 104-11, Part I.
Jan 26, 1995
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 9 - 4.
Jan 26, 1995
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Jan 25, 1995
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 30 - 11.
Jan 25, 1995
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Jan 12, 1995
Joint Hearings Held by the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight and by the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Jan 4, 1995
Referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 4, 1995
Introduced in House
 Votes taken on this bill 2
DateChamberWhat was voted onResultYes–No
Feb 7, 1995 House · vote #95 On Passage Passed 294134 See who voted →
Feb 7, 1995 House · vote #94 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions Failed 185241 See who voted →
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Line Item Veto Act - Grants the President legislative line item veto rescission authority. Authorizes the President to rescind all or part of any discretionary budget authority or veto any targeted tax benefit if the President determines that such rescission: (1) would help reduce the Federal budget deficit; (2) will not impair any essential Government functions; and (3) will not harm the national interest. Requires the President to notify the Congress of such a rescission or veto by special message after enactment of an appropriations Act providing such budget authority or a revenue or reconciliation Act containing a targeted tax benefit.

Allows the President in each special message to propose to reduce the appropriate discretionary spending limit by an amount that does not exceed the total amount of discretionary budget authority rescinded by that message. Requires the President to submit a separate special message for each appropriations Act and for each revenue or reconciliation Act.

Makes such a rescission effective unless the Congress enacts a rescission disapproval bill.

Describes: (1) information to be included in the President's message; and (2) procedures to govern consideration of rescission-receipts disapproval legislation in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Requires the Comptroller General, beginning January 6, 1996, and annually thereafter, to report to the Congress on: (1) a list of each proposed presidential rescission of discretionary budget authority and veto of a targeted tax benefit submitted through special messages for the fiscal year ending during the preceding calendar year, together with their dollar value, and an indication of whether each rescission of discretionary budget authority or veto of a targeted tax benefit was accepted or rejected by Congress;(2) the total number of proposed presidential rescissions of discretionary budget authority and vetoes of a targeted tax benefit submitted through special messages for the fiscal year ending during the preceding calendar year, together with their total dollar value; (3) the total number of presidential rescissions of discretionary budget authority or vetoes of a targeted tax benefit submitted through special messages for the fiscal year ending during the preceding calendar year and approved by Congress, together with their total dollar value; (4) a list of rescissions of discretionary budget authority initiated by Congress for the fiscal year ending during the preceding calendar year, together with their dollar value, and an indication of whether each such rescission was accepted or rejected by Congress; (5) the total number of rescissions of discretionary budget authority initiated and accepted by Congress for the fiscal year ending during the preceding calendar year, together with their total dollar value; and (6) a summary of the information provided by paragraphs (2), (3), and (5) for each of the ten fiscal years ending before the fiscal year during this calendar year.

What's happening now February 7, 1995

Received in the Senate and read twice and referred jointly to the Committees on Budget; Governmental Affairs pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, with instructions that if one Committee reports, the other Committee have thirty days to report or be discharged.

 Committees of jurisdiction 4