Skip to main content
HR 1438 104th Congress House Environmental Protection Agricultural industries Agriculture and Food Animals Authorization Commerce Conferences Congress Congressional investigations Cost effectiveness Ecological research Economics and Public Finance Environmental protection groups Environmental research Estuaries Estuarine area conservation Estuarine ecology Estuarine pollution Federal aid to water pollution control Finance and Financial Sector

DeLauro-Lowey Water Pollution Control and Estuary Restoration Act

Introduced: April 6, 1995 See on congress.gov
 Everywhere this bill has been 6 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Apr 19, 1995
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Apr 18, 1995
Executive Comment Requested from Interior, Commerce, EPA.
Apr 18, 1995
Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans.
Apr 7, 1995
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E844-845)
Apr 6, 1995
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Apr 6, 1995
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

DeLauro-Lowey Water Pollution Control and Estuary Restoration Act - (Sec. 3) Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) to extend the authorization of appropriations for the State water pollution control revolving fund program through FY 2002.

(Sec. 4) Requires a specified percentage (increasing with each succeeding fiscal year) of such appropriations to be used for capitalization grants for estuary plans to qualified States. Makes States that fail to submit approved need estimates ineligible for assistance.

Directs States to establish separate Estuary Accounts in their water pollution control revolving funds, to be used for implementing approved estuary plans. Permits loans made with Account funds to be for terms of up to 40 years or for the useful life of a facility constructed with the loan, whichever is less, if the borrower demonstrates financial hardship. Establishes a State matching requirement for deposits into Accounts.

(Sec. 5) Requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to make grants for the implementation of estuary conservation and management plans. Authorizes appropriations.

Permits certain grants under the National Estuary Program to be used for interim actions adopted by management conferences to protect the water and sediment quality of estuaries.

(Sec. 6) Extends the authorization of appropriations for management conferences, grants, conservation and management plans, and research under the National Estuary Program through FY 2002.

(Sec. 7) Revises National Estuary Program provisions regarding management conference purposes, membership, participation, and duties to, among other things: (1) require conferences to ensure implementation of FWPCA water quality standards; (2) require inclusion as members representatives of Federal fish and wildlife agencies, the agriculture industry, municipalities, and environmental organizations; and (3) direct the Administrator to provide necessary funding, analysis of program needs, and Federal liaison activities for the program.

Directs the Administrator to issue a guidance document establishing requirements for: (1) management conferences to follow in developing and monitoring conservation and management plans; (2) the implementation of interim actions to protect water quality of estuaries for which plans are developed; and (3) the Administrator to follow in approving strategies included in such plans.

Sets forth conditions under which management conferences may be terminated.

Revises approval and implementation procedures for estuary conservation and management plans and establishes procedures for interim actions.

Prohibits any activity located in U.S. waters or which serves new development in such waters from being included in a conservation and management plan or a State needs estimate unless specified Federal officials determine that: (1) the activity is essential to reduce the discharge of pollutants into navigable waters; and (2) there is no practicable alternative to the proposed activity that would have a less adverse impact on the aquatic habitat.

What's happening now April 19, 1995

Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

 Committees of jurisdiction 4