Skip to main content
HR 5377 102th Congress House Economics and Public Finance Administrative procedure Auditing Collection of accounts Congressional reporting requirements Cost effectiveness Government attorneys Government paperwork Government service contracts Income tax Interest Intergovernmental fiscal relations Legal services Statistics Tax refunds Taxation

Cash Management Improvement Act Amendments of 1992

Introduced: June 11, 1992 See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
 Everywhere this bill has been 24 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
Nov 10, 1992
Became Public Law No: 102-589.
Nov 10, 1992
Signed by President.
Nov 4, 1992
Presented to President.
Oct 8, 1992
Message on House action received in Senate.
Oct 3, 1992
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Oct 3, 1992
On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.
Oct 3, 1992
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.
Oct 3, 1992
Mr. Conyers asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendment.
Oct 2, 1992
Passed Senate in lieu of S. 2970 with an amendment by Voice Vote.
Oct 2, 1992
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S. 2970 with an amendment by Voice Vote.
Oct 2, 1992
Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 2970 amended.
Oct 2, 1992
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
Oct 2, 1992
Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Jul 22, 1992
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Jul 21, 1992
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 5377.
Jul 21, 1992
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Jul 21, 1992
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
Jul 21, 1992
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
Jul 21, 1992
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Jul 21, 1992
Considered under suspension of the rules.
Jul 21, 1992
Mr. Peterson (MN) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Jun 16, 1992
Referred to the Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security.
Jun 11, 1992
Referred to the House Committee on Government Operations.
Jun 11, 1992
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Cash Management Improvement Act Amendments of 1992 - Amends the Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990 (the Act) to require the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe regulations for the timely disbursement of Federal funds with respect to each State by July 1, 1993.

Extends the deadline for the Secretary to enter into agreements with States for intergovernmental financing and to prescribe regulations for such financing from October 24, 1992, until July 1, 1993, or by the first day of a fiscal year of the State which begins in 1993, whichever is later. Makes the Act effective on such date.

Extends for one year the report to the Congress by the Comptroller General on the implementation of such Act.

Makes businesses eligible for the Internal Revenue Service tax refund offset program.

Extends the private counsel pilot debt collection program through September 30, 1996, and includes five more jurisdictions. Authorizes the Attorney General to extend or modify any or all of the contracts entered into with private counsel prior to October 1, 1992, for such time as necessary to conduct a full and open competition.

Requires the Inspector General of the Department of Justice to audit such program for the period beginning on Octboer 1, 1991, and ending on September 30, 1994. Requires the Inspector General to determine: (1) the extent of the competition among private counsel to obtain contracts; (2) the reasonableness of the fees under such contracts; (3) the diligence and efforts of the Attorney General to retain private counsel; (4) the results of the debt collection efforts of private counsel retained; and (5) the cost-effectiveness of the project compared with the use of the U.S. Attorneys' Offices for debt collection. Requires a report to the Congress not later than June 30, 1995.

Requires the Attorney General, in order to assist the Congress in determining whether use of private counsel is a cost-effective method of collecting Government debts, to maintain and make available to the Inspector General of the Department of Justice statistical data relating to the comparative costs of debt collection by participating U.S. Attorneys' Offices and by private counsel.

What's happening now November 10, 1992

Became Public Law No: 102-589.

 Committees of jurisdiction 3
 Cosponsors 2
All 2 Democratic 1 Independent 1