Skip to main content
HCONRES 153 100th Congress House Foreign Trade and International Finance Agriculture and Rural Affairs Agriculture in foreign trade EEC countries Exports Food and Food Industry Foreign Trade and Investments Meat Nontariff trade barriers Reciprocity Trade agreements Treaties

A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress in opposition to the third country meat directive by the European Community requiring individual inspection and certification by the…

Show full title

A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress in opposition to the third country meat directive by the European Community requiring individual inspection and certification by the European Community of United States meat plants and urging the President to take strong countermeasures should the European Community deny United States meat imports because of the unfair application of the directive.

Introduced: June 30, 1987 See on congress.gov
This resolution expired with the 100th Congress
It was not agreed to before the 100th Congress (1987–1988) adjourned, so it is no longer active. You can still save it for reference, but it won't receive updates.
 Everywhere this bill has been 3 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
Jul 20, 1987
Referred to Subcommittee on Trade.
Jun 30, 1987
Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means.
Jun 30, 1987
Introduced in House
 Ask about this bill AI · grounded in the bill text

Have a question about what this bill does? Ask in plain English; the answer is drawn from the bill's actual text and official record, and it'll tell you when something isn't in the text rather than guess.

AI answers can be imperfect; always confirm against the full bill text.

 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Expresses the sense of the Congress that: (1) the administration should oppose the implementation of the European Community directive which will limit U.S. access to such Community's agricultural markets; (2) if the European Community denies U.S. meat imports based on unsubstantiated standards or standards not applied to all Community members, the administration should adopt countermeasures; and (3) the administration should communicate to the Community that the United States views the directive as inconsistent with such Community's obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

What's happening now July 20, 1987

Referred to Subcommittee on Trade.

 Related & companion bills 1
 Committees of jurisdiction 2
Cite this page click to expand
APA
U.S. Congress. (2026). H. Con. Res. 153: A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress in opposition to the third country meat directive by the European Community requiring individual inspection and certification by the European Community of United States meat plants and urging the President to take strong countermeasures should the European Community deny United States meat imports because of the unfair application of the directive.. 100th Congress. Open America. https://openamerica.io/bill/100-HCONRES-153/
MLA
"H. Con. Res. 153: A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress in opposition to the third country meat directive by the European Community requiring individual inspection and certification by the European Community of United States meat plants and urging the President to take strong countermeasures should the European Community deny United States meat imports because of the unfair application of the directive.." 100th Congress, 2026, Open America, https://openamerica.io/bill/100-HCONRES-153/.
Bluebook (legal)
H. Con. Res. 153, 100th Cong. (2026), https://openamerica.io/bill/100-HCONRES-153/.
Markdown link
[H. Con. Res. 153: A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress in opposition to the third country meat directive by the European Community requiring individual inspection and certification by the European Community of United States meat plants and urging the President to take strong countermeasures should the European Community deny United States meat imports because of the unfair application of the directive.](https://openamerica.io/bill/100-HCONRES-153/)
Report a problem